Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #560970
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Clouds are made of water |
| Date | 2016-03-09 23:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dkbqoqFn5sU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <3f3dbb0c-9baf-422a-b502-d1a03e5a4219@googlegroups.com> <3957213f26b82a90a25d8a7105c52bd9@dizum.com> <d407daa5-67a9-45e1-a293-864a9799187e@googlegroups.com> <3b5bb9d859e32fe3ed0cfab088d08e86@dizum.com> <op.yd1kucv5tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:14:26 -0500, \"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117 wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:59:33 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >> Repeating the same stupid non sequitur > > we noticed. > > http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/sample-rate-and-rms.80042/ > > "Thank you all for your tips and insights! > > I've played some more with MATLAB during the couple of days and here's > where I've gotten to. Ok, I plotted the sine wave in accordance with the > sampling rate AND plotted the RMS (which is a straight line)." > > > "No, you can work out the RMS value of a sine wave by sampling at almost > any frequency. It's safe to use any frequency > 2F, but as long as you > avoid subharmonics, F and 2F, you can use any other frequency." Is he confused about the continuous solution vs. the discrete solution? As seen in TOW: The RMS value of a set of values (OR A CONTINUOUS-TIME WAVEFORM) is the square root of the arithmetic mean of the squares of the values, or the SQUARE OF THE FUNCTION THAT DEFINES THE CONTINUOUS WAVEFORM. [emph. added] So there's a discrete definition AND a continous definition. Guess which one is more correct for a continuous, periodic waveform? For a sine wave, the RMS is a/sqrt(2). There is no "t" in this equation. And no, you can't claim to be using the discrete definition, then start talking about "instantaneous averages". Seriously, WTF? -- -v
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:12 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-07 12:27 -0500
Re: Clouds are made of water James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 10:09 -0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 14:33 -0600
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:18 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 21:49 -0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 09:03 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 00:57 -0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 00:30 +0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:29 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 08:50 -0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:59 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:14 -0500
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:18 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 23:43 +0000
Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 18:58 -0500
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 04:43 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 23:53 -0500
Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 09:44 +0000
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 17:59 +0000
Re: Clouds are made of water Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:03 +0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:29 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 07:48 +0000
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:54 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:20 +0000
Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:27 +0100
Re: Clouds are made of water James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 21:25 -0800
Re: Clouds are made of water Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-08 23:45 -0600
csiph-web