Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods
Date	Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:04:30 +1100
Lines	46
Message-ID	<diku6eFr9ctU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<24a12a79-d358-4886-8889-188a679ff00d@googlegroups.com> <dikot5Fq67rU1@mid.individual.net> <5ac57606-8210-48fc-a59e-11cdd96b8d02@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net v8YN8xFkNOBxCTSmRnSfEwNFK4Dox6sgLYDubQoKcg9YcEXD+C
Cancel-Lock	sha1:CBkEWm3qGQu80dvIkIOG5bCGJCw=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To	<5ac57606-8210-48fc-a59e-11cdd96b8d02@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:554137

Show key headers only | View raw

On 18/02/2016 2:19 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 10:34:18 AM UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 13/02/2016 12:10 PM, Peter Riedt wrote:
>>> Kepler's 3rd law with adjusted orbital periods
>>>
>>> Kepler's third law in the form t2/r3 gives a constant value. It is a precise law but applying it with the measured values for the orbital periods in seconds for t and the measured semi major axis in metres for r produces results with small differences.
>>>
>>> It suggests that the measured numbers for t and/or r are incorrect. However a small adjustment to the tsec values achieves an identical constant for all nine planets. The adjustments to the tsec values are from -0.065% to +0.002%.
>>>
>>>
>>> 	measured tsec	adjusted tsec	  semi major axis
>>> MER 	    7,600,752	    7,600,552	   57,909,175,000
>>> VEN 	   19,414,681	   19,414,164	  108,208,930,000
>>> EAR 	   31,558,464	   31,558,202	  149,597,890,000
>>> MAR 	   59,356,661	   59,353,354	  227,936,640,000
>>> JUP 	  374,365,908	  374,574,616	  778,412,010,000
>>> SAT 	  929,317,806	  929,468,424	1,426,725,400,000
>>> URA 	2,651,442,610	2,653,184,989	2,870,972,200,000
>>> NEP 	5,200,560,940	5,203,431,644	4,498,252,900,000
>>> PLU 	7,823,994,908	7,828,997,025	5,906,380,000,000
>>> 			
>>> 	t2/r3 (incorrect t)	t2/r3 (adjusted t)	
>>> MER 	2.97489048E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> VEN 	2.97489192E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> EAR 	2.97478313E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> MAR 	2.97506530E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> JUP 	2.97141972E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> SAT 	2.97376974E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> URA 	2.97082795E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> NEP 	2.97145237E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>> PLU 	2.97093373E-19	        2.97473376E-19	
>>>
>>> Peter Riedt
>>>
>>
>> Don't you think that a 262 second error in the length of an Earth year
>> would have been noticed by now?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Good point. Maybe the seconds are correct but the semi major axis is wrong.
>

Or maybe you've simply got the math wrong.

Sylvia.

Thread

Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-12 17:10 -0800
  Kepler's orbital constaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 19:25 -0800
    Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-12 20:35 -0800
      Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 22:55 +0100
        Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-15 16:32 -0800
          Re: Kepler's orbital constaints noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:35 -0800
            Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-15 16:45 -0800
          Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 08:16 +0100
            Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-16 00:39 -0800
              Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 02:16 -0800
          Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 07:44 -0600
            Re: Kepler's orbital constaints benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
              Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:53 -0600
            Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-16 11:04 -0800
              Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:56 -0600
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-17 17:22 -0800
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:02 -0600
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0800
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 05:51 +0100
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-18 22:10 -0800
                Re: Kepler's orbital constaints Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 07:30 +0100
  Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 09:42 -0600
    Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-13 16:18 -0800
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 15:45 -0600
  Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-02-13 17:45 -0800
    Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-13 19:24 -0800
  Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 19:09 +0100
    Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-14 17:44 -0800
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-14 19:50 -0600
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 07:16 +0100
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 08:30 +0100
        Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-15 16:21 -0800
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 08:20 +0100
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 04:28 -0800
        Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-16 05:19 -0800
        Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:16 -0500
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:30 -0600
            Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:55 -0500
              Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:58 -0600
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:21 -0500
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 23:05 -0600
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 01:27 -0500
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:00 -0600
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:19 -0500
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 15:45 -0600
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:15 -0500
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 07:28 -0600
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:21 -0500
                Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 08:29 -0600
        Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-16 11:01 -0800
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:30 -0800
  Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-18 13:34 +1100
    Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-17 19:19 -0800
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-18 15:04 +1100
        Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-17 20:51 -0800
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-18 16:57 +1100
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 07:33 +0100
          Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 10:07 -0600
            Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-02-18 16:16 -0800
      Re: Kepler's 3rd with adjusted orbital periods Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 07:27 +0100

csiph-web