Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #552601

Re: rotation

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: rotation
Date 2016-02-12 21:23 +0100
Message-ID <di6taqF8of4U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <1154eb10-8c9d-4045-a20f-4b5291631906@googlegroups.com> <di2k4tF584mU1@mid.individual.net> <n9i3li$2ff$2@gioia.aioe.org> <di4bdaFj8q7U1@mid.individual.net> <56BD6770.4010505@sbcglobal.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 12.02.2016 06:02, schrieb Tom Roberts:

> Everything you wrote is a complete fabrication and has NOTHING WHATEVER
> to do with rotation or light cones (ostensibly what you are attempting
> to write about).
>
> Why do you bother to just make stuff up and pretend it is true? What's
> the point?

I did not write about light-cones, but about black holes.

I assume a physical reality of spacetime, where the axis of time could 
turn in some regions into directions, which other observers regard as 
spatial.

See from the back a timeline points into the future and drags the 
observer and (everything else) with it.

This is a picture and similar to what the term 'black hole' means.

Seen from the other side (or: time-reverted) a black hole is similar to 
what we call 'big bang'.


TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: rotation Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 13:51 +0000
  Re: rotation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 06:13 -0800
    Re: rotation Muddy Shoes <shoes@muddyshoes.org> - 2016-02-11 14:37 +0000
      Re: rotation john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 06:58 -0800
        Re: rotation HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 08:41 -0800
  Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-11 22:05 +0100
    Re: rotation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-11 23:02 -0600
      Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-12 21:23 +0100
        Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-13 06:25 +0100
          Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-14 05:03 +0100
            Re: rotation benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 23:57 -0500
              Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-14 15:50 +0100
              Re: rotation Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-02-16 08:48 +0100

csiph-web