Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #540784

Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX.

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics, rec.arts.sf.science, sci.astro
Subject Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX.
Date Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:15:10 +1100
Lines 22
Message-ID <ddspluFb01jU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <n59h0i$47r$2@dont-email.me> <n5agho$h0h$1@dont-email.me> <V1aey.26993$Gc6.11018@fx08.iad>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net cl72InKd9MdkHYZDCXppxwpxi/W4tkKQjUrcr4CyGQSZavRyiY
Cancel-Lock sha1:5tvrtMbH1bO5NXEId/mKc9HFZzo=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To <V1aey.26993$Gc6.11018@fx08.iad>
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:540784 rec.arts.sf.science:24046 sci.astro:57543

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 22/12/2015 9:59 PM, benj wrote:
> On 12/21/2015 10:37 PM, Rick Pikul/Chakat Firepaw wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:42:02 -0500, Robert Clark wrote:
>>
>>> Launch with an attempt at a return-to-launch-site landing pushed back to
>>> today, Monday evening:
>>
>> An update, since no one seems to have posted it, (in ras.science at
>> least):
>>
>> The landing was successful and the crowd at SpaceX went nuts.
>
> This is a HUGE advance for science!

Huh?

This is engineering, not science.

Clearly, it's good engineering. But it's still not science.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. "Robert Clark" <rgregoryclark@gmSPAMBLOACKail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:42 -0500
  Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Rick Pikul/Chakat Firepaw <chakatfirepaw@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 03:37 +0000
    Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> - 2015-12-21 21:48 -0700
    Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-22 16:20 +1100
      Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-12-22 15:08 +0000
      Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2015-12-22 16:38 +0000
        Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 09:35 -0700
    Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 05:59 -0500
      Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-12-22 22:15 +1100
        Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:17 -0500
        Re: Attempt at a return to launch site landing by SpaceX. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 13:31 -0800

csiph-web