Re: Having _everything_ on a mostly empty "C:" drive.

From	dvus <dven1@adelphia.net>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Having _everything_ on a mostly empty "C:" drive.
Date	2015-11-21 15:35 -0500
Message-ID	<dbc2shF1a8kU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.19{4.40A.Seattle.2015}> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.21{4.18A.Seattle.2015}> <dbbcjnFq1guU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.21{7.00A.Seattle.2015}>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/21/2015 10:00 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You (@dvus) asked me:

>> Why aren't you keeping the OCZ as your boot drive
>> and using the new one [Samsung 850 EVO] for data?

> I enjoy the
> sense of freedom and simplicity I get from having _everything_ on a
> mostly empty "C:" drive. A TeraByte is _far_ more than I'll need, next 4
> years. I back up to a 128 gig USB3 thumb drive; although it's half as
> fast as my SSD, it's more portable. Likely, I'll give the "OCZ Vertex 4"
> to a friend; she'll love it, I'm sure.

I'm sure she will. Enjoy your new drive.

-- 
dvus

Thread

Re: Even the cheapest SSD lasts "a lifetime" (for me). dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-21 09:14 -0500
  Re: Having _everything_ on a mostly empty "C:" drive. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-21 15:35 -0500
    Re: Having _everything_ on a mostly empty "C:" drive. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-21 22:34 +0100
      540 MegaBytes/Second reading, 520 writing, Max. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-21 13:46 -0800
        Re: 540 MegaBytes/Second reading, 520 writing, Max. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-21 23:13 +0100
          540 MegaBytes/Second reading, 520 writing, Max. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-21 15:25 -0800

csiph-web