Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #520451

Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 11.09.2015 15:03, schrieb Lleyton H. Bellucci:
> Il giorno Fri, 11 Sep 2015 05:56:26 -0700  *_fuller.david_* ha scritto:
>
>>> While in Relativity Tensors are something Inconceivable IMMATERIAL,
>>> defined /assumed floating in empty space, "spacetime" or wherever, in
>>> Divergent Matter Tensors are pretty much WELL posed literally MATERIAL.
>>>
>>> Of course they are embedded in the Matter which is Expanding. In numbers
>>> this gives a score of
>>>
>>> Relativity 0 Divergent Matter 2
>>> Have a nice weekend.
>>
>> It is simple matter is an amount of entropy, that entropy is increasing.
>
> Wow, this must give
>
> Relativity 0
> Divergent Matter 3
>
> I really appreciate.

Actually I think, that GR is true and there is a physical entity called 
'spacetime'. This we observe from the inside, because we are a part of 
that entity, like anything else.

Matter is also a part, like a wave is a part of the ocean.

I explain matter a 'structures' of/in spacetime. This matter is 
'relative' (to the specific FoR, from where we observe).

So matter is not matter in some other FoR, if that is chosen in a 
certain way. This is a mutual relation, where one object is shrinking in 
one FoR, while expanding in another FoR.

Once it's too small to see, it has 'dropped behind the event horizon' - 
where it still is unchanged.

Our observation is then like a 'comoving cut', since we are using the 
same kind of clocks around the globe.

The surface of the Earth is not the only possible place. It is only 
difficult to leave (for us as common human beings). But we could imagine 
to be in another location and observe the world from there.

That FoR would be like our view upon the universe. We would only see a 
different 'universe' there, since in different FoR we have also a 
different way to measure time and a different order of causal relations.

The latter assumption is usually, what people make dislike this idea. 
But it is actually much more plausible than the calender-like timeline 
of big-bang-theory.


TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 11:29 +0000
  Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 11:54 +0000
    Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 11:58 +0000
      Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-11 08:18 -0400
        Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 12:36 +0000
          Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 12:45 +0000
    Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-11 08:15 -0400
      Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 12:39 +0000
  Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued "Lleyton H. Bellucci" <lleyb@stratospheree.org> - 2015-09-11 13:03 +0000
    Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-12 08:33 +0200
      Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-12 08:24 -0400
      Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued Frances Espinosa <franesp@portio.org> - 2015-09-12 16:03 +0000
    Re: The Nonsense of Divergent Matter - continued Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-12 21:45 +0200

csiph-web