Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #516950

Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV )

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV )
Date 2015-08-26 06:46 +0200
Message-ID <d44uliFkr0hU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <mr9ldg$kut$1@dont-email.me> <d42brcF10kcU1@mid.individual.net> <76cotaddgh0n3nf2kaq69h2ghnjanscsui@4ax.com> <d44630FfhqoU1@mid.individual.net> <588qtalvgh9biosbiclk7pv86dq8avf28m@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 26.08.2015 04:14, schrieb K Wills (Shill #3):

>>>> To understand this, I refer to my own idea called 'structured spacetime'.
>>>
>>>        So, as always, you are simply making stuff up.
>>>
>>>> According to this concept, there exist some invisible field called
>>>> 'spacetime' and matter is a structure of/in this quaternion-field.
>>>
>>>        Spacetime is a well known concept in physics. To claim it as your
>>> own is very dishonest. But you are often dishonest.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
>>
>>
>> Well, yes, spacetime is known - in the context of SRT and GR.
>>
>> But my attempt was, to connect GR to QM (GR:= General Relativity
>> QM:=Quantum Mechanics).
>>
>> So I tried to build something like QM out of spacetime (of GR).
>>
>> This is actually possible and that's what I have tried to show.
>>
>
>       You did a very poor job of it.
>
>> I tried to create particles (what QM deals with) out of spacetime (of
>> GR). To do this I assume
>
>       Once again, assumptions mean NOTHING!
>
> [snip the rest since none of it is based on any science, but
> assumptions.]
>

Your definition of the term 'science' is different to mine.

You apparently refer to certain believes that are commonly called 
'materialism'. Within this context science is 'hard' (material) and done 
by (approved!) scientists.

So you reject immaterial things like ideas.

The other extreme is called 'idealism'. This is more 'immaterial', hence 
would have less problems with ideas.

I personally think, that what is in fact important is quality (as 
universal principle) and that is neither matter nor idea.

Pure materialism is not a very good idea, since it leaves out such 
important questions like direction, amount or e.g. harmony.

If you subtract matter from the behaviour of a system you get to the 
immaterial world, that idealists deal with. This is wrong, too, since - 
obviously - stuff exists.

To come to some kind of better method, it is actually useful to assume 
something. And this is actually what I do.

You may rightfully reject my assumptions, but not the process itself, 
since without trying to find a solution to a certain problem, it is VERY 
unlikely to find one.

And the outcome of such a process is not 'hard science', but an idea 
(assumption, guess). Those you don't like (for unknown reasons). But 
this is more or less your problem and not mine.


TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-25 07:13 +0200
  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 04:09 -0500
    Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-25 23:47 +0200
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:14 -0500
        Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-26 06:46 +0200
          Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 03:57 -0500
            Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-26 21:25 +0200
              Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-28 05:16 +0200
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 04:17 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-28 19:10 +0200
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:36 -0500
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 07:41 +0200
                Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
      Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 12:58 -0700
  Re: Rocky's beliefs ( gave a photo of hypocenter 2 FNV ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 06:51 -0400

csiph-web