Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS)

From	Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx>
References	(2 earlier) <8g5cuadqbgsngskikp7j7i4tde1639e907@4ax.com> <o4fduapi9aac0vicbq8heid0gjk5k7eud3@4ax.com> <68oeua5npdcgnkauvag411rj53qn7l2066@4ax.com> <hq3gua14ta8j84dhk2rcat14442m8ss5kc@4ax.com> <6sdhuadmluf5d8f9vtgg9lncdge5be04df@4ax.com>
Subject	Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS)
Message-ID	<cfbc935d78d0bc7e9754563e32ec25e3@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Topaz, in <news:6sdhuadmluf5d8f9vtgg9lncdge5be04df@4ax.com> did thusly
jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 04:13:56 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
> <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:

>> They could have had a herd of wild elephants knock down the Twin
>> towers and #7.
>> Rather than deal with what *could* have happened, let's stick
>> with what really did happen, OK?

> One thing that really happened is that your TV lied to y<SMACKAKOOK!>

I suppose it's never occurred to you that the reason you're so
irrationally filled with hatred is the same reason you believe every
stupid conspiracy theory to come down the turnpike. Of course, it's
the same reason that realization has never occurred to you... because
you're insane. Your brain isn't working right.

You've never had an uneasy niggling feeling about that? Not at all?
Because you _are_ quite insane, you know.

> CIA insider tells 911 truth. Time to re-examine your Worl<SMACAKOOK!>

BTW, your "CIA insider" Susan Lindauer is a delusional schizophrenic
nutjob who believes she has psychic abilities and can utter
prophecies. She had no connections whatsoever to the CIA... and her
only actual connection to anyone who *did* have connections with the
CIA was a physician with ties to the middle east. She was a conspiracy
theory nutjob even back then, continually pursuing meetings with him
to pump him for information. He broke off contact with Lindauer due to
what he described as an increasingly "seditious bent" to her
discussions. IOW, she went off the rails.

She was arrested by the FBI for taking money from the Iraqi
Intelligence Service, and indicted for acting as an unregistered agent
of a foreign government... IOW, a spy.

She was later arrested at Carswell AFB for psychological evaluation,
only released after she was deemed mentally unfit to stand trial. She
then began k'laming she was a CIA asset... but in reality, she had
just known someone years prior (who had cut off all contact with her)
who was a CIA asset. She was later yet again found mentally unfit to
stand trial and judged to be mentally insane. Psychotic.

She was never a CIA agent, she was never a CIA asset. Believe the
stupidity that tard spews at your own risk... you'd do well to
research her claims completely, given that she's been caught in many,
_many_ lies. Par for the course for a psychotic delusional kook...
they all lie to sustain their delusions.

<https://www.metabunk.org/susan-lindauer.t2494/>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20130620221315/http://www.scribd.com/doc/46046645/US-v-Susan-Lindauer-NYSD-448-F-Supp-2d-558-2006>
<https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/46046645-us-v-susan-lindauer-nysd-448-f-supp-2d-558-2006-pdf.1445/>
"Although defendant denies she is mentally ill, she is plainly aware
of what others think, and so, as Dr. Kleinman noted, she "is disposed
to dissimulate, i.e., minimize the presence and extent of her
psychiatric difficulties, especially to mental health professionals —
whom she distrusts and generally dislikes." (Kleinman Report 12/13/05
at 8) She acknowledged to him that if she testifies at her trial she
will have to avoid touching on such subjects as her psychic powers,
but "also noted that when (metaphorically) attacked by others she has
spontaneously uttered prophecies." (Id.at 46)

But then, given that you're just as insane as Susan Lindauer, there's
little surprise that you'd not only believe her wholly implausible
kookbabble, but that you'd accept it wholesale as your own delusion.

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

Thread

Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
  Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
    Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
    Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
      Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
      Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
        Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
    Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
      Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
        Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
          Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
            Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
        Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
          Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
            Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
            Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
            Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
              Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
                Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
                Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
                Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
                shinola t.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:58 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
                Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
                Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
                Re: Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
                Re: Topaz terrorist  (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
    Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
      Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
        Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
        Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
    Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500

csiph-web