Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721610
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! |
| Date | 2018-12-30 15:13 -0700 |
| Organization | Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com |
| Message-ID | <bs85f2.dft.19.4@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <5ad79dcd-0397-4ac8-be1e-87d839843c6e@googlegroups.com> <bs7tld.el8.19.7@news.alt.net> <fdad11ed-753f-4c83-8562-bd996664dd7b@googlegroups.com> <bs80ip.p2f.19.1@news.alt.net> <a14ff538-92c7-45ef-994e-e9e0be8198fc@googlegroups.com> |
On 2018-12-30 3:01 p.m., mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 12:50:01 PM UTC-8, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-30 1:28 p.m., mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 12:00:14 PM UTC-8, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-30 12:53 p.m., mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 11:02:35 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 4:36:33 AM UTC+2, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-29 7:29 p.m., mitchrae3323@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 4:31:00 PM UTC-8, por...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 11:42:46 PM UTC+2, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2018 2:30 PM, Buck Futter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> 'CUVED' is not a real English word >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 'TABGUBLE' is not a real English word >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 'PORCE' is not a real English word. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please learn how to real English words >>>>>>>>>>> before posting more of your insane >>>>>>>>>>> wibbles, you copraphagous philatelist. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> you engrlish teacher ?? >>>>>>>>> ======================= >>>>>>>>> ok >>>>>>>>> let us neglect spalling >>>>>>>>> and concentrate on the physics >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>> what are those curved force lines >>>>>>>>> that we see tangibly >>>>>>>>> in that Faraday experiment with a permanent magnet >>>>>>>>> it is obvious that those force lines are coming out of that >>>>>>>>> piece of iron that magnet >>>>>>>>> that is sort of a dead '' metal >>>>>>>>> and even so not dead'' as it might be considered >>>>>>>>> that is some unknown process that is going in and >>>>>>>>> out of it !! >>>>>>>>> tangible curved force lines >>>>>>>>> if so >>>>>>>>> may be gravity force lines are spreading out >>>>>>>>> but until now there was wot a way >>>>>>>>> to detect them >>>>>>>>> but out of a mass gravity force lines sure should be detected >>>>>>>>> that way or another way- >>>>>>>>> because we know -- masses are detecting each other >>>>>>>>> =not only detecting >>>>>>>>> but mutually ACTING AS WELL >>>>>>>>> ON EACH OTHER EVEN FROM DISTANCE !!! >>>>>>>>> HOW ?? >>>>>>>>> moreover >>>>>>>>> we know that there is some - recycling process >>>>>>>>> -or else. it could not last forever as we know gravity >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in short : >>>>>>>>> see the '' Y circlon mechanism '' >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *at its appendix >>>>>>>>> ============== >>>>>>>>> TIA >>>>>>>>> Y.P >>>>>>>>> ============ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lines of force are first invisible around >>>>>>>> a magnet. Add Iron filings to give their >>>>>>>> visible evidence porat. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mitchell Raemsch >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> shake filings >>>>>> =================== >>>>>> not clear what do you mean by >>>>>> Fillings '' >>>>>> -- >>>>>> yet I think you got the base of the problem !!: >>>>>> >>>>>> in general >>>>>> Faraday as well . did not ''see'' those ''force lines'' >>>>>> directly >>>>>> but found an ingenious way >>>>>> to ;see'' them tangibly ** indirectly!!! ** >>>>>> and reliable '' tangibly ! !! >>>>>> >>>>>> so we have to do it as well >>>>>> for ****weight** force' lines as well >>>>>> >>>>>> so we have to find a way to ''see' weight force lines >>>>>> INDIRECTLY but yet reliable !! >>>>>> >>>>>> ======================= >>>>>> TIA >>>>>> Y.P >>>>>> ====== >>>>>> >>>>>> on a pie plate and stroke the plate with a violin bow , >>>>>>> the patterns are so much better then when you use a magnet >>>>> >>>>> Magnetic lines of force are invisible until you introduce >>>>> small pieces of Iron to visibly reveal them. Don't claim >>>>> ignorance porat. >>>>> >>>>> God creates gravity. >>>>> >>>>> Mitchell Raemsch >>>>> >>>> they aren't invisible , >>>> they just can't be seen , >>>> with a human eye >>> >>> More balogna… Why can the eye not see magnetism you idiot? >>> Break out your electron microscope and they are not seen. >>> Both space curve and magnetism will never be seen they >>> are only revealed by what they do to what can be seen... >>> >>> Mitchell Raemsch >>> >> well you'll certainly never see them on your own so i'll help >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwreHReBH2A >> >> now you have seen a magnetic wave > > > I have already seen a magnetic wave imbecile… > The Magnetism in Electro-Magnetic Waves entering > my eye. > > What can't be seen are round curves of force. > Lines of force are only in the mind... > But they are also physically real > curves of motion demonstrate it. > > Mitchell Raemsch > >> >> and there no need for name calling pig faced gear headed slapnutted >> moronic sperm burpin buffoon > > Idiot. > fool · ass · halfwit · nincompoop · dunce · dolt · ignoramus · cretin · imbecile · dullard · moron · simpleton · clod · dope · ninny · chump · dimwit · nitwit · goon · dumbo · dum-dum · dumbbell · loon · jackass · bonehead · fathead · numbskull · blockhead · dunderhead · chucklehead · knucklehead · muttonhead · pudding-head · thickhead · wooden-head · airhead · pinhead · lamebrain · peabrain · birdbrain · zombie · jerk · nerd · dipstick · donkey · noodle · nit · twit · numpty · clot · plonker · berk · prat · pillock · wally · git · wazzock · divvy · nerk · twerp · twonk · charlie · mug · muppet · nyaff · balloon · sumph · gowk · gobdaw · schmuck · bozo · boob · lamer · turkey · schlepper · chowderhead · dumbhead · dummy · goofball · goof · goofus · galoot · dork · lummox · klutz · putz · schlemiel · sap · gink · cluck · clunk · ding-dong · dingbat · wiener · weeny · dip · simp · spud · coot · palooka · poop · squarehead · yo-yo · dingleberry · wing nut · drongo · dill · alec · galah · nong · bogan · po
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 11:15 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! Buck Futter <invalid@example.com> - 2018-12-29 12:30 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 15:42 -0600
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 16:30 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 18:29 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-29 19:36 -0700
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! littlefox <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0600
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 23:02 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-29 23:15 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 11:53 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 13:00 -0700
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 12:28 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 13:49 -0700
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 14:01 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 15:13 -0700
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 15:58 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 15:56 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:05 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2019-01-01 16:12 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! littlefox <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-29 20:47 -0600
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 12:31 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 15:59 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 12:36 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-30 12:39 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-12-30 14:16 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-30 16:06 -0800
Re: CUVED FORCE LINES !! Dave Parker <invalid@example.com> - 2019-01-01 15:38 -0800
csiph-web