Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #555305

Re: Reduced Lift Myth

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Reduced Lift Myth
Date Sun, 21 Feb 2016 20:18:19 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 30
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <blippc-19o.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <47c1bec7-1249-4b50-b312-376f37756113@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="13033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19l3PB2aGIGWNU56N+8N0FI"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:ETs2mSG8+ir10crNrFaslo3Zp04=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:555305

Show key headers only | View raw


James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Aviators base their understanding of moisture in the atmosphere upon
> what they were told by meteorologists.

Nope, aviators base their understanding of the effects of temperature,
prssure, and moisture on aircraft performance on the experiments of 
aeronautical engineers and physicists.

Aviators base their understanding of current weather on meteorologists.

> But meteorologists never understood water.

Thousands of people and hundreds of years and only you got it right?

> So it is largely mythology based.

Literally millions of experiments by thousands of people with identical
results, and not just by meteorologists.

> But it works in most instances, kind of like Ptolemaic system of
> celestial motion, it works but it isn't accurate.

Extremely accurate in all cases.

<snip delusional babbling>

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Reduced Lift Myth James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 08:33 -0800
  Re: Reduced Lift Myth Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 13:47 -0600
  Re: Reduced Lift Myth jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-21 20:18 +0000
    Re: Reduced Lift Myth James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-21 12:49 -0800
      Re: Reduced Lift Myth James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 09:39 -0800
        Re: Reduced Lift Myth Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 12:09 -0600

csiph-web