Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #574031

Re: Why quantum cryptography could be a one-way street

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Why quantum cryptography could be a one-way street
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:20:11 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 7
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <bdbavc-uu8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <ho2dnSSKYJbO57_KnZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="24464"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NUMOyUW9zAvhsSQC95Rs9"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:+Yb1J8xlfrEBBgPh8UUnRf21OIo=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:574031

Show key headers only | View raw


Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why quantum cryptography could be a one-way street

Or a dead end.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why quantum cryptography could be a one-way street Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 16:02 -0500
  Re: Why quantum cryptography could be a one-way street jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 21:20 +0000

csiph-web