Groups > sci.physics > #691972

Re: Self drive cars

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2018-06-26 16:03 -0700
References	(1 earlier) <fpbeqmFepbkU1@mid.individual.net> <pgrnjj$1v7c$1@gioia.aioe.org> <21348767-ba1e-4b49-9444-c09b37affd4e@googlegroups.com> <fpd8qnFpum2U2@mid.individual.net> <a1098799-0bcf-4f2e-8778-92e4b0423bdf@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<a6aa8f35-e46a-4a0e-9c19-e3c31c2b298b@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Self drive cars
From	"reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, June 26, 2018 at 3:05:50 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
> On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 3:31:54 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> > On 26/06/2018 7:46 AM, Double-A wrote:
> > > On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 2:42:16 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> > >> On 6/25/2018 1:01 AM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > >>> On 24/06/2018 12:26 PM, john wrote:
> > >>>> Even if a driver is there supervising, things happen so quickly that
> > >>>> unless a person is feeling the road- actually driving- there is no
> > >>>> time to react.
> > >>>> Nevergoing to work on roads- maybe in Space
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Driver supervision is only being used during development. The intent is
> > >>> that the end product will be fully autonomous, with no driver, only
> > >>> passengers, and the latter will not be criminally liable for accidents
> > >>> or breaches of the road laws.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sylvia.
> > >>
> > >> fully autonomous vehicles will always have accidents,
> > >>
> > >> sensors fail, age, lose calibration
> > >> probability of detection is never  100%,
> > >> probability of false detection is never  0
> > >> one cannot identify or characterize all road hazards
> > >> plugs corrode, disconnect
> > >> the system has an overall failure rate
> > >>
> > >> the courts, lawyers, owners, victims, hospitals, will all demand
> > >> liability be identified.
> > >>
> > >> that June Bug your car hit at 60 mph took out the front right radar
> > >> unit, which missed that pedestrian you hit.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The goal is not that self driving cars should be perfect, that only that they have less accidents than human driven cars.
> > > 
> > 
> > **Correct and, in that sense, we are very close to that goal. Another 5 
> > years should see that aim completed.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Trevor Wilson
> > www.rageaudio.com.au
> 
> 
> Also, as soon as the fast food restaurants redesign their drive throughs to accommodate them, you should be able to send your care to drive itself to the Pizza Hut, or whatever, by itself to pick up your order!  That way, if the car does get in an accident, you won't even be in it!  
> 
> Double-A
Cars like that will be running when all humankind is dead before they  hit the ground.Will these robot cars be color bigots? Will a Caddy


 try to take over the world.Will electric cars say gas cars fart? Will big heavy cars become bullies.  I think all this started so you do not have to tip a human delivering a pizza
Bert

Thread

Self drive cars john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 19:26 -0700
  Re: Self drive cars Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-23 20:44 -0700
    Re: Self drive cars benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-24 01:09 -0400
      Re: Self drive cars Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 03:49 -0700
    Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-24 13:24 -0700
  Re: Self drive cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2018-06-25 16:01 +1000
    Re: Self drive cars Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 01:59 -0700
      Re: Self drive cars "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 19:12 -0700
        Re: Self drive cars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-25 19:34 -0700
    Re: Self drive cars Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 16:42 -0500
      Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-25 14:46 -0700
        Re: Self drive cars Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-26 08:31 +1000
          Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-26 15:05 -0700
            Re: Self drive cars Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-27 08:30 +1000
            Re: Self drive cars "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 16:03 -0700
              Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-26 16:44 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-26 18:52 -0500
                Re: Self drive cars john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 18:45 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-28 13:53 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2018-06-28 16:04 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-29 13:22 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 13:44 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-06-29 13:50 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-26 19:57 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-26 22:12 -0700
                Re: Self drive cars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-06-28 13:57 -0700
              Re: Self drive cars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-26 22:10 -0700
      Re: Self drive cars Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-26 08:30 +1000
  Re: Self drive cars "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 19:02 -0700
    Re: Self drive cars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-25 19:33 -0700

csiph-web