Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #557126

Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow
Date 2016-02-27 03:52 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <a5j7qc-sac.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <c6eb2b43-5f91-4e27-bf61-57a3c079148b@googlegroups.com> <n8udnVEVcePKR03LnZ2dnUU7-K2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <a5dc7249-961b-49ca-ac6f-c5103ae48677@googlegroups.com> <naqtuh$1grl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <69583319-d3e1-4302-91e7-f11d4395dd0f@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 5:25:46 PM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>> <snip crap>
>> 
>> STFU Troll
> 
> Are your pants wet too?

Are you saying yours are?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:47 -0800
  Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:59 -0600
    Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:02 -0800
      Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 17:05 -0600
        Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:20 -0800
          Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-26 19:24 -0600
            Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 18:33 -0800
              Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-27 03:52 +0000
  if Galileo were not as stupid as noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:11 -0800
  Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-26 18:28 -0600
  Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:42 -0800
    Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 17:59 -0600
    Re: If you start out with a backwards understanding of the nature of atmospheric flow Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 19:26 -0600

csiph-web