Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #637652
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Rule Of 72 |
| Date | 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000 |
| Organization | "Have EDDT, will travel" |
| Message-ID | <PM000552C94BDAFACC@aca403ad.ipt.aol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <594BE91A.543A@ix.netcom.com> <PM0005529F3D0AE111@aca4473b.ipt.aol.com> <594D4BD8.5512@ix.netcom.com> <PM000552B35C30858F@aca40855.ipt.aol.com> <594E8F6A.6F83@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
The Starmaker wrote: > jmfbahciv wrote: >> > Well, I wasn't talking about "numerology" beforehand, ...but since You seem >> to recognize it as "numerology" then you >> > are stating it was ...numerology. >> >> But you were doing numerology in the text which has been elided; it was >> a half-assed numerology rendition. > > I wasn't really aware I was doing numerology...I thought I was doing science > math highly advanced mathematics! I'm not aware of any advanced science math which is dependent on counting the occurrence of numerals in all values. >> No wonder you have problems in this newsgroup's topics. I'm beginning >> to understand how you think. > > > I wasn't really aware I was...thinking. ROTFLMAO. >> >> /BAH > > humbug/ A very old worn-out joke. /BAH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:27 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-06-18 00:46 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-18 07:03 -0500
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-18 13:21 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Jack Fearnley <jack@alcor.concordia.ca> - 2017-06-18 18:42 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-18 14:18 -0500
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-19 12:43 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Sегgi о <iinvalid@invalid.com> - 2017-06-19 08:45 -0500
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-20 12:12 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-19 12:43 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-19 10:46 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-19 20:01 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-20 12:12 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-20 07:28 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-21 12:19 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-22 12:28 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-22 08:58 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-23 11:40 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-23 10:11 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-24 11:40 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Valok Planek <lkupuu@kwklewan.oo> - 2017-06-24 11:46 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-24 09:12 -0700
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-25 13:50 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 Jack Fearnley <jack@alcor.concordia.ca> - 2017-06-20 14:54 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-06-21 12:54 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2017-06-18 14:07 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 David Bernier <david250@videotron.ca> - 2017-06-18 12:38 -0400
Re: The Rule Of 72 djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2017-06-18 19:27 +0000
Re: The Rule Of 72 "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-18 16:07 -0700
csiph-web