Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #529657
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
| Date | Sun, 01 Nov 2015 01:40:12 -0700 (Seattle) |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.1{1.40A.Seattle.2015}> (permalink) |
| References | <9fOdnZS7pPB7HK7LnZ2dnUU7-f-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <3glcgc-pv3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <C7WdnfQrc_US0qjLnZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <0n1ggc-fcf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <Fb2dnZoNld9s86jLnZ2dnUU7-N2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.computer.security, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.hacker, alt.privacy.anon-server |
| Subject | Why make quantum computer ? |
| User-Agent | Jeff-Relf.Me/X.ZIP |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@blueworldhosting.com |
| Organization | BWH Usenet NNTPSwitch-Cluster |
| Lines | 12 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 01 Nov 2015 03:40:13 -0500 |
| X-Trace | 9346d5635cfedec90b8a612247 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1435 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 2370356484 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:529657 comp.os.linux.advocacy:330046 alt.computer.security:5453 comp.sys.mac.system:84553 alt.hacker:9347 alt.privacy.anon-server:46647 |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Bob_Watkins (in Sci.Physics) wrote: > The biggest stumbling blocks in the way of practical quantum computers > are the transmission and storage of quantum states, > whatever their physical embodiment, in the computer's hardware. > > Reliably entangling qbits, and then maintaining their coherence, > can be done, but it's difficult and it's expensive. Quantum Computing isn't just expensive, it's (nearly?) impossible and has no known benefits. Why make quantum computer ?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 09:42 -0500
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:42 -0400
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 17:22 +0000
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 10:49 -0700
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Bobby Sifuentes <bobsif@academicinstitute.org> - 2015-10-30 15:46 +0000
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 17:20 +0000
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:32 -0500
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 00:07 +0000
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:46 -0500
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-01 02:22 +0000
Why make quantum computer ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-01 01:40 -0700
Re: Why make quantum computer ? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 04:58 -0600
Re: Why make quantum computer ? dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 11:08 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2015-11-01 16:19 +0000
Re: Why make quantum computer ? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 16:25 -0600
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 07:57 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 08:06 -0600
Re: Why make quantum computer ? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-01 17:12 +0000
Why make quantum computer ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-01 09:53 -0800
Re: Why make quantum computer ? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:11 +0000
Quantum "bits". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-01 13:26 -0800
Re: Quantum "bits". Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:47 -0500
Re: Quantum "bits". R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-11-02 01:51 +0000
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:50 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 08:07 -0600
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-02 11:08 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:49 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 18:12 -0600
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:49 -0500
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2015-11-01 21:37 +0000
Re: Why make quantum computer ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-11-01 19:48 -0500
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-11-01 13:53 +0000
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 18:32 -0600
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:33 -0500
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:16 -0400
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 04:55 -0800
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 08:07 -0600
Re: Hey jimp | let's have a discussion about the progress toward quantum computing Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-11-01 11:13 -0500
csiph-web