Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #571195
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes |
| Date | 2016-04-17 17:22 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <9ctcuc-b2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <VvCdnZQfc6MCcY3KnZ2dnUU7-WHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <if18uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <4KudncANjtO1lI7KnZ2dnUU7-SPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <23jbuc-lvo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <fqCdnXoV6M1r3I7KnZ2dnUU7-T_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:23jbuc-lvo.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:if18uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:vto2uc-5dp.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:prb0uc-ndh.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:km80uc-n3h.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>> message >>>>>>>>>>> news:nejp0q$li$1@pcls7.std.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you have prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something very unusual about the destruction of three >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> World Trade Center because they are much smaller than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been for the size buildings that went down or were supposed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gone down and ended up floating away instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. ROTFLMAO >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And your evidence the readings were too low or "unusual" is..... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> missing because Jim failed to post any supporting evidence with >>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>>>>>> post. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The seismic records on 9/11 have been posted many times by many >>>>>>>>>> people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are dead wrong about WTC7 but what they didn't do with the >>>>>>>>> seismic >>>>>>>>> records from WTC1 and WTC2 is what is important. They have never >>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>> compared to other collapsing buildings or jackhammers and they >>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>> been. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jackhammers don't generate seismic signatures that can be detected >>>>>>>> more than a few blocks away. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And your proof of that is what? >>>>>> >>>>>> The energy of a jackhammer. >>>>> >>>>> And why didn't the destruction of WTC7 have an S-wave or P-wave? >>>> >>>> As you have been told many, many, many times, the collapse of a building >>>> is not an earthquake. >>> >>> So now you are telling me none of the buildings should have had S-waves >>> or >>> P-waves just because WTC7 didn't leave any? >> >> No, I am telling you yet again that the collapse of a building is a >> different thing than an earthquake. > > And I'm telling you that the seismic records for three buildings are Exactly what one would expect. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 22:16 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 17:48 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:10 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:30 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 21:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 08:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:02 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-16 22:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 02:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-20 03:45 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-20 17:17 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 17:34 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 12:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 18:28 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:55 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 19:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:10 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:08 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:49 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 20:20 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 15:37 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 21:56 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 19:14 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 14:57 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:16 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-28 20:44 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 14:12 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:36 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:45 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 11:12 -0500
csiph-web