Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com>
Newsgroups	sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, sci.physics, alt.alien.research
Subject	Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get
Followup-To	poster
Date	Tue, 11 Nov 2025 19:44:45 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	15
Message-ID	<877bvwx942.fsf@posteo.com> (permalink)
References	<10et9sd$6d07$1@dont-email.me> <10etmgf$abqr$1@dont-email.me> <10etqsn$becs$3@dont-email.me> <10f007j$u5ja$1@dont-email.me> <10f0358$v40b$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Date	Wed, 12 Nov 2025 02:44:49 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="a2bbc97d4c96e67015f61710b5d84230"; logging-data="1233742"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198gvVQc+/MpcsilYFEPbul"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:Epkx2ttwZzCtZoIfbyhtEJdnX9Q= sha1:QOXf9TNTZeB5euCPemOR/Pe1aKY=
Xref	csiph.com sci.skeptic:115692 alt.paranormal:16166 alt.atheism:3470531 sci.physics:894526 alt.alien.research:65221

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Followups directed to: poster

Show key headers only | View raw

JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> writes:

> On 11/11/25 1:45 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
>
>> Yes, as of today, they are excluded!
>
> No. Are you on the spectrum or something?  You have a VERY rigid
> way of thinking, excessively limited.

People on the spectrum being too rigid? You should see how rigid
neurotypicals are. They DEMAND their social norms rain supremacy and
will put anyone who doesn't wish to follow social norms through absolute
hell. Neurotypical women use to eat tape worms to stay thin to fit in
and can't say much has changed since then either. Neurotypicals are the
problem and should go fuck themselves.

Thread

Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 13:11 -0500
  Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 15:46 -0600
    Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 18:01 -0500
      Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 12:45 -0600
        Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 14:35 -0500
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 18:29 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:40 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Vincent Maycock <ma.ycock@gm.ail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:55 -0800
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 23:35 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:44 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:05 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-11 19:44 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:35 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-12 01:42 -0700
                Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 11:27 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:04 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 16:42 +0000

csiph-web