Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #607165

Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 6:51 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/28/2016 10:17 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/27/2016 5:58 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nonsense!  The length of the meter is defined by SI as 1/299792458 of the distance traveled by light in one second.  The speed of light is defined in meters per second.  Therefore by this (circular) argument, light can never travel at other than c;  only the defined length of the meter is variable!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Double-A
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The second is the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation
>>>>>> corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of
>>>>>> the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh look Muffy a conversation among the ignorant. The speed of light is
>>>>> not constant. Everybody knows that. The speed of light in vacuum is
>>>>> measured to be constant within measurement errors. (no aether drift) The
>>>>> fact that the speed of light in vacuum is constant and does not depend
>>>>> on direction is what allows light to be used as standards for length and
>>>>> time. Otherwise time of year, directions etc. would all have to be
>>>>> specified. So if the speed of light in a vacuum is not constant and
>>>>> independent of other factors as proposed, then this would throw a kink
>>>>> into all current standards. That is a given.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually Mr. Chimp the definition of an SI second is as you state except
>>>>> that the atom is a zero degrees and at sea level. Sure, you know how to
>>>>> barf Google and pretend to be smart, but you really should learn some
>>>>> REAL science, nutjob.
>>>>
>>>> Benj is so cute when he follows me around trying to nit pick my posts.
>>>>
>>>> BTW kook, it is zero degrees Kelvin and adjusted for the gravity at
>>>> mean sea level.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh look! The nutjob Googled it again after I told him his mistake. And
>>> now he pretends to have known it all along. Sure. wanker, sure.
>>
>> Oh look, the stalker is still attempting to nit pick my posts and
>> attempts do deflect attention from my correction of his last nit pick.
>>
>>
> Lie. YOu taking lessons from HVAC? Or do you work on the same team?

The last person I knew that babbled about people on teams was taken
away by guys in white coats kook.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-27 13:44 -0800
  Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 22:54 +0100
    Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-28 13:57 -0800
      Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 08:09 +0100
        Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 08:21 +0100
  Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 22:58 +0000
    Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 17:08 -0500
      Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 03:17 +0000
        Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:46 -0500
          Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:51 +0000
            Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:34 -0500
              Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:51 +0000
                Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:47 -0500
                Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 06:06 +0000
    Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-28 16:45 -0800
      Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 20:46 -0500
      Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 02:04 +0000
  Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 11:50 -0800
    Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-20 13:06 -0800
    Re: Variable, Not Constant: Speed Of Light Theory Challenging Einstein's Physics Can Now Be Tested Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-20 13:25 -0800

csiph-web