Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #523590

Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11
Date Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:57:26 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 19
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <6lbodc-0ca.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <xtednVXqlZXizpTLnZ2dnUU7-X2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="14099"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//DmFgWc59F/FuSSrJjt1k"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:2bDWx3lQYP+zmPT8caBsCYkWhKI=
Xref csiph.com alt.astronomy:276954 alt.conspiracy:268623 sci.physics:523590

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> Ever wonder why none of the government shills will say what they think 
> happened on 9/11/01?
> 
> It is because if they did they would figure out they all have different 
> versions of the bullshit we were fed about 9/11/01.
> 
> Case in point.  Look how many different stories there are as to how a 757 
> ended up completely inside the Pentagon even though no other 757 has ever 
> folded it's wings back before landing.
> 
> Rocky 

There is only one story as to how a 757 ended up completely inside the
Pentagon and it did not fold it's wings back, you raving lunatic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-28 09:52 -0500
  Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-28 17:57 +0000
    Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 11:17 -0400
      Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 11:24 -0400
        Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 13:32 -0400
          Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 15:19 -0400
            Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-29 17:29 -0500
              Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-29 19:02 -0400
                Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-29 20:47 -0400
                Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 04:24 -0500
      Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-29 17:05 +0000
  Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 14:06 -0700
    Re: Why the government shills will not say what they believe about 9/11 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-01 21:39 +0000

csiph-web