Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #542505
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment |
| Date | 2015-12-31 19:46 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <6adglc-d8b.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <L_-dnVgD-bfVWR_LnZ2dnUU7-eMAAAAA@giganews.com> <ni7glc-nja.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <U72dnbW3p_qh5hjLnZ2dnUU7-RcAAAAA@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > The more scholarly Wikipedia reader follows up the references, as the > Wikipedia article tend to target a more general audience. It is very > unfortunate that the Wiki article are over the heads of many USENET > posters these days. The Little Engine that Could is way over the heads of many USENET posters these days. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-29 11:35 -0600
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2015-12-30 23:05 -0800
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 03:02 -0500
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 05:06 -0800
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-31 18:08 +0000
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 13:00 -0600
Re: Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science’s detriment jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-31 19:46 +0000
csiph-web