Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #896670

Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote:
> 
> On 8/16/2026 10:29 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> > Den 15.08.2026 21:41, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
> >> On 8/15/2026 8:33 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> >>> Den 14.08.2026 19:14, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> the clocks of GPS are synchronized, just like
> >>>> the engineers postulated them to be.
> >>>> Not indentical, as postulated by some mumbling
> >>>> madmen.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Maciej, you obviously don't know what the words "postulate"
> >>> and "synchronise" mean.
> >>
> >> Paul, you obviously impudently lie, as expected
> >> from  a piece of fanatic, relativistic shit.
> >
> > So you snip everything I wrote without reading it,
> > and call it a lie. Pathetic!
> 
> Sorry, poor piece of shit, snipping
> impudent lies is no way pathetic.
> 
> >
> > I challenge you:
> > Read the following, and if you find something which you think
> > is wrong, quote me literally and explain exactly what is wrong.
> >
> >
> > Let's see what engineers _specify_ about the GPS SV clocks:
> > (SV = Space Vehicle, satellite)
> >
> > GPS Interface Specification Document:
> > https://www.gps.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/IS-GPS-200N.pdf
> >
> > Quote from 3.3.1.1 Frequency Plan:
> >  Â  "The carrier frequencies for the L1 and L2 signals shall be
> >  Â Â  coherently derived from a common frequency source within the SV."
> >
> > It is a frequency standard which defines the rate of the SV-clock.
> > This frequency standard is an atomic clock (oscillator) with the
> > SI-definition of second inbuilt.
> 
> A lie, of course - your SI idiocy
> is demanding 9 192 631 770 , SV
> clock have 9 192 631 774. You were admitting
> it many times, pathetic lying piece of shit.
> 
> >  Â  "The nominal frequency of this source -- as it appears to an
> >  Â Â  observer on the ground -- is 10.23 MHz."
> >
> > This means that the frequency standard is 10.23 MHz whether it is
> > in the SV or on the ground. This is according to the SI-definition
> > of second. 10.23 MHz = 10230000 cycles per SI-second.
> > The SI-definition of second is the same in the SV, on the ground
> > and everywhere.
> 
> Nobody cares what your SI idiocy is.
> The second of GPS is different. Engineers
> made it according to their own postulates,
> not the postulates of your idiot guru.
> 
> >  Â  "The SV carrier frequency and clock rates
> >  Â Â  -- as they would appear to an observer located in the SV
> 
> >  Â Â  -- are offset to compensate for relativistic effects.
> >     The clock rates are offset by  Δf/f = -4.4647E-10.
> >  Â Â  This is equal to 10.2299999954326 MHz."
> >
> > NOTE THIS:
> > ==========
> > This means:
> > If the SV-clock were emitting the frequency 10.23 MHz,
> > then the frequency received on the ground would be
> > 10.23*(1 + 4.4647E-10) MHz = 10.2300000045674 MHz.
> 
> No, poor trash, that doesn't mean.
> 
> > So to make the clock in the SV have the same rate
> > as a clock on the ground, the frequency standard in
> > the SV has to be adjusted down by the factor (1 - 4.4647E-10).
> > 10.23*(1 - 4.4647E-10)MHz = 10.2299999954326 MHz.
> 
> "would appear" that it has. Or maybe wouldn't.
> A MEASUREMENT - comparing this frequency to a REAL
> (not gedanken) clock on a satellite will give
> 10.23MHz. That's because engineers fucked mad
> postulates of your idiot guru and make clocks
> according to their own.
> 
> >
> > This is predicted by the General Theory of Relativity,
> > and is now thoroughly confirmed by the fact that the GPS works.
> 
> Even such a disgusting piece of lying shit
> as you are, Paul, can't lie non stop -
> so sometimes you admit that the real measurement
> results have little in common with that
> mad mumble of your idiot guru.


I don't know where people get the idea that General Theory of Relativity
has anything to do with GPS???

I guess they will say eventually that it was the General Theory of
Relativity of Asteroids thatt killed the dinosaurs, ...and General
Theory of Relativity confirmed it.

There is a name for this 'kind' of science...Jewish Science. 


Indoctrination.

Indoctrination is the act of teaching a person or group to accept a set
of beliefs, ideas, or rules without questioning them. 
It relies on repetition and discourages critical thinking or alternative
views. 

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define++Indoctrination 


dats the foundation of all Jewish Science.


If you happen to know any Jewish persons in the field of science, tell
them to
take all their money and go back to Israel.









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Doees The Shit of Einstein predict any measurement results or not The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-08-16 22:52 -0700

csiph-web