Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere
Date	2016-02-29 21:20 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<69peqc-ao6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <8ac5d698-2cff-4f8d-b6aa-532a0dcd9148@googlegroups.com> <0tucqc-ij.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ade4dba7-aa6e-4faa-b711-ff4b9d5886a9@googlegroups.com> <snheqc-bu5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <d684b347-ecd1-4208-ac25-5f76060610e2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 11:16:06 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 9:01:07 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 3:24:23 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> No one gave a shit the first 4 times you posted this nonsense.
>> > 
>> > Do you still have no dispute?
>> 
>> Delusional babble.
> 
> How would you characterize the nature of your dispute?  

What dispute would that be?

It is you that is making bat shit crazy claims so it is up to YOU to
defend them with proof.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 19:47 -0800
  Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 04:43 +0000
    Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 22:57 -0800
      Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:11 +0000
        Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 13:02 -0800
          Re: Jet Stream Plasma Atmosphere jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 21:20 +0000

csiph-web