Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts)

From	"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts)
Date	2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Organization	Sooper Sekrit Gov'mint Agency. Shhhhhhhh.
Message-ID	<67l4ta1aolcdbt0eu5k6ap2tmitht3klbu@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <eh93tap81a1ik74rb5sf315bn1vfa2bvfs@4ax.com> <tqm3ta1fk7ja9semrfquueap4fdk2nb8u1@4ax.com> <7cWdnfrcl6G-n0_InZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <d457bb3fc7ef071e0ebbe5183449a865@dizum.com> <SvydnVLXBK8RhU_InZ2dnUU7-XmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:22:34 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>"Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> 
>wrote in message news:d457bb3fc7ef071e0ebbe5183449a865@dizum.com...
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Rocky, in <news:7cWdnfrcl6G-n0_InZ2dnUU7-eWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
>> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>>> news:tqm3ta1fk7ja9semrfquueap4fdk2nb8u1@4ax.com...
>>
>>>> Oh he is absolutely entertaining! What fun. He's getting frustrated
>>>> and annoyed  having so many facts slapped in front of his face. Full 
>>>> steam ahead!   :)
>>
>>> And just don't forget after you explained that a shotgun has a "spread
>>> pattern" I asked you to explain why you think a deep underground nuke 
>>> should *not* have a "spread pattern."
>>
>> Because a nuclear explosion is not a shotgun blast, you
>> brain-damaged drooling fuckwit.
>
>But with the rock it had to work it's way through that acted like the barrel 
>of a shotgun you clown.
>
>Still nothing explains the following lack of debris better than a deep 
>underground nuke that could not reach the areas lowest and furthest from it.
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>
>> A nuclear weapon explodes outward in *all* direction, and nothing
>> will redirect the full brunt of that amount of force. That's why
>> seismometers can detect nuclear explosions the world over.
>
>YOU FUCKHEAD.  Put a nuke deep underground in lots of rock and now try to 
>say what it does.  <G>
>
>Once it gets to the surface it does the following:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
>You keep refusing to deal with nukes that were detonated in solid rock way 
>below WTC3 and after working it's way up to the surface hat nuke could not 
>destroy things exactly like a nuke on the surface could.  DUH.
>

     Your nukes would have needed to be *at least* 37 *miles*
underground. We lack the technology to get  down that far.

>Now once more try to describe an underground nuke going off in solid rock 
>and having to work it's way up to the surface you clown.  Here I'll even 
>help you out with:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     The image shows the effects of the collapse of the twin towers.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

Thread

(Thread has 945 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)

csiph-web