Re: QED and QM Reality

Date	2015-06-03 07:00 -0500
From	Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: QED and QM Reality
References	<4df7b4cc-7415-4539-a9d5-fd6d6abc6bc7@googlegroups.com> <tqudnVUoy64WJvHInZ2dnUU7-YWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <34691484-a7a3-4c13-b0c2-ba1366d1b131@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<5oidneaKcZDEcfPInZ2dnUU7-RmdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/2/15 4:47 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> Sam I want to jump in here to say that my scientific reasoning is not based on math.

   Then you would be wrong, Herb, as all physical theories are
   mathematical. Nature seems to me a mathematician.

-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion
of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related
social issues.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: QED and QM Reality Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-03 07:00 -0500
  Re: QED and QM Reality "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-06-03 09:27 -0700
    Re: QED and QM Reality Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-06-03 11:38 -0500
      Re: QED and QM Reality Enomis Skating <anomis.edenomis@libero.it> - 2015-06-03 10:07 -0700

csiph-web