Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #589904
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Improving Swimming Efficiency w/ Heat Trials |
| Date | 2016-07-19 05:11 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <5dp06d-pdj.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <299b2bfe-737d-4bbf-add4-7679adc96b40@googlegroups.com> <gfnv5d-p2g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <54bcf9de-da0c-4732-bfaf-8deb3eb1fb5e@googlegroups.com> |
Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote: >> > If you cannot sink much heat then you won't be burning many calories >> > at a very high rate for very long. The system will literally overheat >> > internally and you'll croak. > >> Runners don't seem to "literally overheat internally" and "croak" > > 1. heat the air up to 37 C w/ 100% r.h. and the runner will croak. Apples and oranges; you said water at 35 C. And having run in similar conditions and still being alive, I can empirically say you are full of shit. > 2. air offers less resistance than water Irrelevant to cooling. >> so why >> should swimmers? > > Try swimming a km in 35 C water and report back with your best time. Which would prove nothing. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Improving Swimming Efficiency At w/ Heat Trials Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-07-18 10:43 -0700
Re: Improving Swimming Efficiency At w/ Heat Trials jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-18 19:32 +0000
Improving Swimming Efficiency w/ Heat Trials Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-07-18 21:09 -0700
Re: Improving Swimming Efficiency w/ Heat Trials jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-19 05:11 +0000
Re: Improving Swimming Efficiency w/ Heat Trials Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> - 2016-07-20 22:40 -0700
csiph-web