Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #690032
| Message-ID | <5B1EB55E.55C8@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-11 10:46 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: Rocky |
| References | (1 earlier) <ade0f7f0-7c00-46dc-a6de-325b139c69c9@googlegroups.com> <5B1CBC8D.782@ix.netcom.com> <5f8b0e01-a091-40bb-a319-9f2e44980127@googlegroups.com> <5B1D6882.66E1@ix.netcom.com> <44e9dbc3-73e1-4bd5-80f1-856f03bea836@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
rotchm wrote: > > On Sunday, June 10, 2018 at 2:05:41 PM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote: > > rotchm wrote: > > > > A "structure" is a "thing", as in a thought is a "thing", > > > if you chose to define it such. > > > > A structure is not a thing, it's the arrangement of things. > > Define what *you* mean by "thing". > > > I mean, a rock and a person/human are both made of the same things... > > Theya re made of "atoms" where 'atoms' is a thought, a belief; Or, atoms are a model. Or, they are the specific result of an operational definition, a classification; matter. > > > Now, using "classifications" is a mistake.. > > Nope. > > > you cannot call Earth a planet and Mars a planet... > > the word "planet" is a classification. > > > In other words...Earth is not a planet, ...at least not like Mars. > > The word 'earth' and 'mars' are classifications. > > > So why call earth and mars a planet, they don't look the same to me? > > The set of integers and the set of primes, all have integers. Yet, the sets differ. Classifications. > > > Relative to Nature as the observer...earth and mars are not planets. > > As per the usual definition of 'planet', yes they are. As history has shown of Pluto...yous people cannot be *trusted* with "definition of 'planet'"... YOUS DON'T HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT A PLANET IS!!!! Show me a sample of another ...earth. Calling Earth a planet...is stupid. Why are yous stupid people calling Pluto a comet now? https://www.space.com/40687-pluto-formation-1-billion-comets.html Pluto May Actually Be A 'Giant Comet,' New Study Suggests | HuffPost stupid, stupid, stupid. "a billion comets"???? stupid, stupid, stupid. Go feed your dogs to the turtles.... stupid, stupid, stupid. "a billion comets"???? I demand a recount!
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-08 15:04 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-08 21:39 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-09 10:51 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-09 22:52 -0700
Re: Rocky Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-09 23:10 -0700
Re: Rocky benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 12:52 -0400
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-11 10:29 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-11 10:46 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-12 23:46 -0700
Re: Rocky Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-13 02:15 -0700
Re: Rocky Daniel60 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2018-06-14 19:03 +1000
Re: Rocky Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-06-14 02:42 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-13 08:55 -0700
Re: Rocky The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-13 10:16 -0700
csiph-web