Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #646124
Show key headers only | View raw
benj wrote: > > On 8/15/2017 8:54 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 9:36:17 AM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > >>>> On 8/14/2017 10:06 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 11:45:00 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/14/17 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 10:38:24 PM UTC+10, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 5:06:42 PM UTC+10, alal...@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 4:35:50 AM UTC+5:30, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/13/17 3:56 PM, alal65536@gmail.com wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't want to read the book, as last time I read a book on > >>>>>>>>>>>> cosmology, it wasted my time by discussing quarks. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I've asked you what evidence you have that everything about quarks has > >>>>>>>>>>> been fabricated. You've produced nothing, absolutely nothing. So is > >>>>>>>>>>> there a reason you believe what you do? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I may be lazy, but I am not a liar. Over time, perhaps you will learn > >>>>>>>>>> to trust me. How solid is the evidence you have seen on quarks? How > >>>>>>>>>> reliant are you on other people? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Abhinav Lal > >>>>>>>>>> Writer & Investor > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Any theory worth anything must make valid predictions if that theory is > >>>>>>>>> to be considered scientific. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Which the theory of quarks does, many times over, verified in experiment > >>>>>>>> many times over. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Really. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jet production in lepton and hadron colliders. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mumbo-jumbo. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No, it's not mumbo-jumbo. It's perfectly understandable, even to lay > >>>>>> readers. > >>>>> > >>>>> If it is perfectly understandable to lay readers then explain it in a few lines. > >>>>> > >>>> Sorry Banjo, But Odd doesn't do explanations. He just tells people to go > >>>> look it up in some book. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Because for explanations that take 40 or 50 pages, it makes sense to find > >>> them in a book, not on usenet. Obviously. > >> > >> obviously such explanations are not explanations but obfuscations. > > > > Seriously? You can't read 40-50 pages without getting confused? > > Your attention span is 30 min? > > Hey Boinker, nobody who isn't insane can read 40-50 pages of "modern" > physics without being confused. i get confused after 40-50 characters..who reads a page or pages??? If it is not on the first page of Google....
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 09:45 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 12:20 -0500
Re: Why is there something? poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-08-19 00:11 -0700
Re: Why is there something? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Why is there something? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 12:23 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-13 14:07 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-14 11:46 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 11:45 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 13:17 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-08-15 13:48 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:33 -0700
Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 13:56 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 16:21 -0500
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:05 -0500
Re: Why is there something? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-14 00:06 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 11:33 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:00 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 12:38 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 05:42 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 06:27 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 08:44 -0500
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:06 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 13:00 -0500
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 17:55 -0400
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 16:17 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 23:36 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:38 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 00:54 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:36 -0400
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:40 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 21:54 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 02:28 +0000
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-17 17:24 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:34 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-15 21:25 -0500
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-16 16:38 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 08:14 -0700
Re: Why is there something? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:24 -0400
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-16 01:30 +0000
Re: Why is there something? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-14 07:45 -0500
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-13 22:28 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-08-13 18:04 -0500
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-08-13 17:25 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-08-13 21:02 -0500
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-14 07:17 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:13 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 18:00 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 15:38 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 19:29 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:37 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:41 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:56 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 17:41 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-15 21:33 -0400
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 18:53 -0700
Re: Why is there something? KCIR2 <rick_s7777777@yahoo.ca> - 2017-08-13 17:36 -0700
Re: Everything is nothing because the (4-D) timescape is static, immutable. "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2017-08-14 10:02 +0000
Re: Why is there something? "Anthony Zen Pride Week" <sender@hotmail.com> - 2017-08-16 07:13 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 07:29 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-16 17:30 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-17 20:42 -0700
Re: Why is there something? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-17 22:49 -0700
Re: Why is there something? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-08-18 08:14 -0700
csiph-web