Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #640223

Re: The Alvarez hypothesis

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.glorb.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:10:45 -0500
Message-ID <5966744A.743B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:11:06 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: The Alvarez hypothesis
References <59615B14.5490@ix.netcom.com> <E5WdnQIyt_bAevzEnZ2dnUU78c_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <596278DC.4A8D@ix.netcom.com> <jI2dnd_-XoFxqP7EnZ2dnUU78c3NnZ2d@supernews.com> <59644880.77BF@ix.netcom.com> <59656C30.731F@ix.netcom.com> <5965C5D2.3CF4@ix.netcom.com> <P8SdnSVh7LoYTfjEnZ2dnUU78KHNnZ2d@supernews.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 170712-0, 07/12/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Lines 85
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-R86IbRW3qvT9fgq/DxTI6ZctDQRVaWu/eKF/hkzmcCw8gcxEt+DMv5wI18g+d3on5icuJiUdM54geg3!9Hy6diLIpabf2m3EGPHtWpjaIzgpiUzvYWsA1BuaVquOXITGVzLa26hsRWFEJXZeJsjEsHmQueo7!Bb9Bm9BUxWA=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 3830
X-Received-Bytes 3952
X-Received-Body-CRC 1451653743
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:640223 sci.physics.relativity:424637 rec.arts.sf.written:474714 alt.astronomy:292102

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Mike Dworetsky wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish
> >>>>> jokes...which
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, not Polish.  Some of my ancestors came from Lithuania,
> >>>> Latvia and Belarus.
> >>>
> >>> When you put Lithuania, Latvia and  Belarus....watta you get?
> >>> Baltic state = Poland.
> >>>
> >>> Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states?
> >>> https://www.google.com/#q=baltic.countries
> >>> http://www.answers.com/Q/Estonia_Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states?#slide=2
> >>>
> >>> Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a pin at you? A: Run like hell
> >>> - he's still got a hand-grenade between his teeth.
> >>>
> >>> Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a hand-grenade at you? A: Take
> >>> the pin out and throw it back.
> >>
> >> Is this perfect or what?  Mike Dworetsky saying 'I'm not Polish but
> >> my ancestors are Polish'!
> >>
> >> That is like the Perfect Polish Joke!!
> >>
> >> This is the kind of thinking you find in.. of all places....science
> >> groups.
> >>
> >> Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It
> >> took him 2 hours to get his family out.
> >
> >
> >
> > You know what that Mike Dumbretsky is doing right now...tryin to find
> > a work around to 'I'm not Polish but my ancestors are Polish'!...
> >
> >
> > he might as well commit suicide..
> >
> >
> > he's probably right now jumping from a basement window!
> >
> >
> > wat a Dumbsky..
> 
> This all sounds to me like you are a Nazi antisemite.

You still haven't explained what a NAZI is, but I never heard of an "Nazi antisemite", is that means a person against juewish nazies????


But I heard all you people see NAZI's in your chicken soup...



>  Dworetsky is a
> Russian name (depending on how you convert Russian to English letters, it
> can be spelled in a variety of ways).

(there is the work around i was expecting...now the Dumbsky clains he's russian)


Does this guy EVER tell the truth???? He fuckin Lies every fuckin day!



> 
> --
> Mike Dworetsky
> 
> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)


everybody in his family are removing their pants...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Alvarez hypothesis  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 15:22 -0700
  The Alvarez hypothesis "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-08 16:43 -0700
    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 20:49 -0700
  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis  "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-09 09:20 +0100
    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 11:41 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:46 -0700
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:15 +0100
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:16 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:35 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 14:57 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:25 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:49 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:08 +0100
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:39 -0700
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 20:45 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:19 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:59 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:47 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:31 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:00 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:02 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:06 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 08:54 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:48 -0700
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 17:24 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 23:46 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:32 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-12 12:11 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-13 08:35 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-13 09:06 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 06:42 -0700

csiph-web