Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #639893
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:39:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <59644880.77BF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:39:44 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Alvarez hypothesis |
| References | <59615B14.5490@ix.netcom.com> <E5WdnQIyt_bAevzEnZ2dnUU78c_NnZ2d@supernews.com> <596278DC.4A8D@ix.netcom.com> <jI2dnd_-XoFxqP7EnZ2dnUU78c3NnZ2d@supernews.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 170710-18, 07/10/2017), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 172 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-YlX/5CfMf9zA03IwnB8L6RCye7y0cKw7BcHVN+cvUu0q5rOLGoVtIWcIkcqyjt3qaQJ+n8IaUZ+ITHa!Nrx+f7TgSePl5zbATEgMxD2IRjuimEVaEJUf9yBnpsn8/uI/8iPJ1cXGruHpUh6fq9kK03pEUExF!XUkmDvYVqjs= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 5992 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:639893 sci.physics.relativity:424481 rec.arts.sf.written:474622 alt.astronomy:292070 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Mike Dworetsky wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > Mike Dworetsky wrote: > >> > >> The Starmaker wrote: > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarez_hypothesis > >>> > >>> > >>> hypothesis: > >>> a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption > >>> of its truth. > >> > >> But there was evidence for the idea, hard physical evidence, which > >> is what prompted it in the first place. > > > > > > "hard physical evidence"???? Then why are they still asking the > > question "What happent to the dinosaurs?" > > > > Who are "they"? If a huge impact of an asteroid did not happen, how do you > explain the hard physical evidence of an iridium-rich layer at the KT > boundary everywhere that it can be found on Earth? How do you explain the > discovery of a large crater of the exact correct age, now mostly underwater > in the Yucatan region? poppycock. > > > > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> a couple of spanish kooks make a joke...and you guys fall for it. > >> > >> Spanish? The surname may be Hispanic, but the Alvarezes were both > >> natural-born Americans. Are Nobel prize winners in Physics "kooks"? > > > > "nobel prize winners"??? You mean winner, not winners?? > > > > Let's look closely at this noble prize winner... > > You are not looking closely. > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Walter_Alvarez > > > > > > > > "Alvarez devised a set of experiments to observe K-electron capture > > in radioactive nuclei, predicted by the beta decay theory but *never* > > observed." > > > > > > When you devise "a set of experiments " ..."to observe" but it is > > "never observed", what do you call that? KOOK! > > I call it extremely clever experimental work. It had never been observed by > other scientists BEFORE Alvarez devised an experiment to detect the expected > radiation. He observed it. Then he is not a kook, he's a fraud. There is alot of that going around in your community, even today. > > > > > > > That's what Kooks do. They even get famouse for doing it.... > > > > > > > > Then..."With his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, he developed the > > Alvarez hypothesis which proposes that the extinction event that > > wiped out the dinosaurs was the result of an asteroid impact." > > > > > > You gotta give the kid something. His son is a Total Failure! > > > > They do not have a "geology" category in the Nobel prizes, but Walter > Alvarez received several important awards for his work, such as the Vetlesen > Prize (the prestigious geology equivalent of the Nobel) and the Penrose > Prize. Many other areas of study are excluded from the Nobel prizes but > there are prestigious equivalents (mathematics, for example). Prizes are just things people come up with to pretend that they are still...revelant, and they are not. You can easily come up with your own webpage, offer a ten thousand dollar prize for best 'material' submitted, and give yourself the top prize. Then put it in your resume. > > > > > the Alvarez hypothesis is a fuckin joke! > > > > > > > > and the yokes on Yous. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> If I was a dino 66 million years agao... > >>> > >>> and with all the advance technology I had at my disposal.. > >>> > >>> how much time do I got? > >> > >> About 5 seconds..4..3..2..1..0...bye bye! > >> > >> -- > >> Mike Dworetsky > >> > >> (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) > > > > > > Dworetsky??? What, you're Polish???? I know some Polish jokes...which > > Actually, not Polish. Some of my ancestors came from Lithuania, Latvia and > Belarus. When you put Lithuania, Latvia and Belarus....watta you get? Baltic state = Poland. Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states? https://www.google.com/#q=baltic.countries http://www.answers.com/Q/Estonia_Latvia_Lithuania_and_Belarus_make_up_the_what_states?#slide=2 Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a pin at you? A: Run like hell - he's still got a hand-grenade between his teeth. Q: What do you do if a Polak throws a hand-grenade at you? A: Take the pin out and throw it back. > > > one you wanna hear? They are have one common theme, Polish are > > stupid. Why is that? > > > > Because there are a lot of racists like yourself? The Nazis loved to tell > Polish jokes. Are you a Nazi? I don't know, I never gave it much thought...What is a Nazi? > > > > > > > Did you hear about the polock that locked his keys in the car? It > > took him 2 hours to get his family out. > > -- > Mike Dworetsky > > (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 15:22 -0700
The Alvarez hypothesis "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-08 16:43 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 20:49 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-09 09:20 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 11:41 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:46 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:15 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:16 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:35 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 14:57 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:25 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:49 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:08 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:39 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 20:45 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:19 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:59 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:47 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:31 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:00 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:02 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:06 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 08:54 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:48 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 17:24 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 23:46 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:32 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-12 12:11 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-13 08:35 +0100
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-13 09:06 -0700
Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 06:42 -0700
csiph-web