Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #639539

Re: The Alvarez hypothesis

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 08 Jul 2017 22:48:56 -0500
Message-ID <5961A7AC.568D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sat, 08 Jul 2017 20:49:00 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: The Alvarez hypothesis
References <59615B14.5490@ix.netcom.com> <0d42eb79-b42e-4635-9501-29fc1be665a2@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 170707-0, 07/07/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Lines 20
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-LrfLkLlTikfA8Haid+KECw1Xp/uxHXpTiJB54/+jPbwxn16bPiiMcDq/PWh7FA7MGOZ6C9czk9zfdIO!co+O2G7SfgZXC+B5ibETsYHyMrn6xziBBuHJxKO25vRnrqKfpeJ100adScKOYBx5fRQ2ac+eN27C!wVAe6iin0I0=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1507
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:639539

Show key headers only | View raw

David (Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote:
> 
> ScatMaker Scatted
> 
> "couple of spanish kooks"
> 
> Evil Bigot & Racist ScatMaker



2+5, the son of a bitch is 7
3+6, the son of a bitch is 9. . .



Mom: you teaching them to say 2+ 2, the Son of a bitch is 4?

Teacher after laughing: What I taught them was, 2+2,

 The Sum of Which is 4

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Alvarez hypothesis  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 15:22 -0700
  The Alvarez hypothesis "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2017-07-08 16:43 -0700
    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-08 20:49 -0700
  Re: The Alvarez hypothesis  "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-09 09:20 +0100
    Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 11:41 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-09 12:46 -0700
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:15 +0100
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:16 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:35 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 14:57 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:25 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:49 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-10 09:08 +0100
        Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-10 20:39 -0700
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-07-10 20:45 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:19 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 06:59 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:47 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 06:31 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-12 07:00 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:02 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 07:06 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 08:54 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-11 14:48 -0700
          Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 17:24 -0700
            Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-11 23:46 -0700
              Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-12 08:32 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-12 12:11 -0700
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum198@pants.btinternet.com> - 2017-07-13 08:35 +0100
                Re: The Alvarez hypothesis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-07-13 09:06 -0700
      Re: The Alvarez hypothesis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-07-10 06:42 -0700

csiph-web