Re: Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers.

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:01:32 -0500
Message-ID	<57AA28A9.2077@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:02:01 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers
Subject	Re: Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers.
References	<cbe40d08-9b54-4160-92b6-febc0d90523f@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.4{6.03P.Seattle.2016}> <hpthqbpeuhe15nsnvo566irtal24efcugm@4ax.com> <b9c806d0-6e70-4798-9fe7-90b02b22914e@googlegroups.com> <daa73d68-69fe-49e6-9ffa-ed466c10ecba@googlegroups.com> <85c69bdb-b429-45ca-a01e-427c20942353@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.9{4.35A.Seattle.2016}>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	15
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-g47fACf20sJyLfvkmZnyLEKOQGsAkhsJAGcnD37U2M1MpVEUsIuXRP0Bi2Z2Z3ll72q/MhbnOAB2GNA!WPkk0shmWrTLsoLRnp/Ya3CLhaQzv0v9YNJsvTMczG64B61hPE8FVU3HPqi3gu4r/68V/BBgNvNQ!QBqtDQFMmtg=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	1801
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:364925 sci.physics:592534 news.software.readers:29912

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> 
> You don't have to pay an Asian programmer $5/hour,
> plenty of Americans will do it for free.
> 
> Are you looking for a hooker or a wife ?
> Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers.
>

Rape is free.

A hooker cost ten bucks more..

A wife cost dinner ($40.00) a house ($500,000,00.00) and a car a littel brat (how much cost the brat?).

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-08 17:22 -0400
  Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 06:51 -0500
    Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-09 19:15 -0400
      Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 19:17 -0400
      Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-10 01:17 +0200
        Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-09 20:10 -0400
          Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 22:39 -0400
        Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-10 07:38 -0500
          The ( SpinFree ) context. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-08-10 07:04 -0700
      Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 20:41 -0400
        Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. flatfish+++ <flatfish4real@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 20:56 -0400
      Re: Re: We're fat, spoiled brats. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-11 21:12 +0200
  Re: Wives cost a _ton_ more; same for programmers. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-09 12:02 -0700

csiph-web