Re: underground oceans

Message-ID	<576ED2FB.22E2@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2016-06-25 11:52 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: underground oceans
References	<576D9DE3.493B@ix.netcom.com> <jmn04d-1s7.ln1@mail.specsol.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > http://www.space.com/33256-pluto-may-harbor-liquid-ocean.html
> >
> >
> >
>   https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=ocean+pluto&oq=ocean+pluto&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i53.873.10773.0.12849.21.10.5.6.8.0.382.1794.1j6j2j1.10.0...0.0...1ac.1.kXSpuGo0-
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought everyone knew already....all planets have underground oceans.
> >
> >
> > Can you name a planet that doesn't?
> 
> Just one?
> 
> OK, Jupiter.

According to David Staup list, one of yous is WRONG?

mecury, venus, jupiter, saturn, uranus, neptune

dumb fuck

what planet is dumb fuck??? 

I cannot keep up with these new planets being found everyday...

According to David Staup list, one of yous is WRONG? Or one of yous is lying.? Which one of yous is wrong or the fuckin liar???

So, who is wrong or who is the fuckin liar, is it Jim Pennino or David Staup???

Thread

underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-24 13:53 -0700
  Re: underground oceans jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-24 22:09 +0000
    Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-25 11:52 -0700
      Re: underground oceans jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 20:24 +0000
        Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-26 11:37 -0700
          Re: underground oceans jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-26 20:35 +0000
            Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-26 17:44 -0700
              Re: underground oceans jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-27 01:16 +0000
                Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-27 00:29 -0700
                Re: underground oceans Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-27 09:03 -0500
                Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-27 10:47 -0700
                Re: underground oceans "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 14:38 -0700
                Re: underground oceans "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 14:50 -0700
                Re: underground oceans benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-27 19:40 -0400
                Re: underground oceans jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-27 15:20 +0000
      Re: underground oceans Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-27 08:57 -0500
  Re: underground oceans David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-06-25 08:09 -0500
    Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-25 11:42 -0700
  Re: underground oceans "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 12:27 -0700
    Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-25 15:10 -0700
      Re: underground oceans Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-27 09:04 -0500
        Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-27 10:35 -0700
          Re: underground oceans Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-27 18:00 -0500
            Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-27 17:19 -0700
              Re: underground oceans The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-28 10:38 -0700

csiph-web