Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #585523

Re: The Gravitational Wave Hoax and Einstein's Spacetime

Path csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:40:16 -0500
Message-ID <5765A3C8.57BD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:40:56 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: The Gravitational Wave Hoax and Einstein's Spacetime
References <00a15c76-f190-4c0d-866b-734aeb5429b1@googlegroups.com> <5763AF33.2834@ix.netcom.com> <57642D4B.48CA@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 67
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-h1Zzikz1HVxQn0A00oi7rTP6J054CclovQ5G4hpli41zySTWTtS0xzHYEw0GwyE0+sDIP5YXtOAjRw9!T8yBYkw3+WSK83mO45Y2qoONSm91Ql+WYXdPsY07Hqq+LoPBobuVzPTnHOc6vD1snCpsWxL4l03z!h1qPs9kMfYY=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 4768
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:585523 sci.physics.relativity:386154 rec.arts.sf.written:442581 alt.astronomy:285272

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > >
> > > The gravitational wave hoax made the situation in today's science even more schizophrenic. On the one hand, scientists know that spacetime, the absurd consequence of Einstein's 1905 false constant-speed-of-light postulate, is fatally strangling physics. On the other, they are forced to hail the ripples in the nonexistent spacetime gloriously "discovered" by LIGO conspirators:
> > >
> > > https://edge.org/response-detail/25477
> > >  What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... (...) The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..."
> > >
> > > http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2016/016562/einstein-revolution
> > >
> > >
> > > The following quotations clearly show that Einstein's relativity should be immediately discarded:
> > >
> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U47kyV4TMnE
> > >  Nima Arkani-Hamed (06:11): "Almost all of us believe that space-time doesn't really exist, space-time is doomed and has to be replaced by some more primitive building blocks."
> > >
> > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727721.200-rethinking-einstein-the-end-of-spacetime.html
> > >  "Rethinking Einstein: The end of space-time (...) The stumbling block lies with their conflicting views of space and time. As seen by quantum theory, space and time are a static backdrop against which particles move. In Einstein's theories, by contrast, not only are space and time inextricably linked, but the resulting space-time is moulded by the bodies within it. (...) Something has to give in this tussle between general relativity and quantum mechanics, and the smart money says that it's
> > >
> > > https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/research/conferences/convergence/roundtable-discussion-questions/what-are-lessons-quantum
> > >  Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?"
> > >
> > > http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2015/08/05/science.aac6498
> > >  "In Einstein's general theory of relativity, time depends locally on gravity; in standard quantum theory, time is global - all clocks "tick" uniformly."
> > >
> > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0610057.pdf
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/
> > >
> > >
> > > Pentcho Valev
> >
> > Did Einstein actually used the words "gravitional wave"????
> 
> In other words, I don't know if Einstein used the words "gravitional
> wave" in his 1915 relativity papers...
> 
> if he didn't, then "gravitional wave" is a fraud.
> 
> I know what a wave is...
> 
> you go to the beach
> and you can see sufers
> on surfboards riding waves...
> 
> you can see the waves on the beach.
> 
> Waves are big things.


Next in the news...( i can predict the future news...)
they will be finding 'gravitational tasmania'!


How much you wanna bet the 'gravitational tasmania waves' will be coming any day soon?

They have to make it bigger, otherwise it will die in the news.


I bet a million dollars you will see 'gravitational tasmania' in the very near future!


i can predict the future....I'm a futurist.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The Gravitational Wave Hoax and Einstein's Spacetime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-18 12:40 -0700
  Re: The Gravitational Wave Hoax and Einstein's Spacetime The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-19 12:22 -0700

csiph-web