Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #578763
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 18 May 2016 01:32:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <573C0C95.633E@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 17 May 2016 23:32:53 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Space-Time and Surrealism |
| References | <nhdppc$isl$1@dont-email.me> <573C07F2.710A@ix.netcom.com> <573C0B1A.5CE3@ix.netcom.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 70 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-qNMXXnlDXkEnbVsSVfXJmQj9cakNPjVTAjtHCrBPT4+xkeJgOhxbY5Bg97lIYitO5ZH0JYK/kwnWkHS!VXJ0hy50vuCUxPQ3VP9E6H/LDZHEtvKxoLYZKRnhMkyCDXfYSwsSiDKhKmWjaPmnAhc8MuBNx7qG!zfRNocSkMHo= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 3596 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 3708 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 2208066062 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:578763 sci.physics.relativity:383676 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > hanson wrote: > > > > > > The term "space-time" is idiotic & ill defined. > > > It has a different meaning and explanation from > > > author to author, each yelling at the other: > > > "You must learn" in their hope to cram their own > > > crap down other folks' throat... ahahahahaha... > > > > > > > In the real world there are 1D lengths or lines, > > > 2D areas or surfaces & 3D volumes or spaces. > > > But "space-time"? > > > Is it the product of "Volume x Time"?, > > > Is it a "Time in the Volume of Space"? > > > > > > > Semantics also says that "space" is a DIFFERENCE > > > or an Interval between 2 points, 2 lines or 2 volumes > > > or 2 times, which is what the SR/GR Lawyer-language > > > uses and then leads to space-like, time-like, mass-like > > > and certainly to _ass-like_ events, -states or -processes, > > > > > > > dubbed as Event-horizons, Roche-lobes, Schwartzschild > > > Radius, Einstein Rings, or Expanding Space, without > > > saying what it expands into, &/or/not specifying that the > > > highfaluting expression of "expanding space" merely > > > means an increase in the interval between 2 observations > > > or happenings, that have nothing to do with any increase > > > of 3D Space or Volume of some media. > > > > > > > Most of these terms mentioned above do NOT exist > > > in the real world, except in the agile minds of Einstein > > > Dinglesberries in/during their worship of AE's sphincter: > > > > > > > AE: "People like us, who **believe** in physics, > > > AE: know that the distinction between the > > > AE: past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly > > > AE: persistent illusion." > > > > > > Einstein's language-use in/for SR/GR is akin to the > > > depiction of Pablo Picasso's bizarre and distorted > > > schmiers of the human face & form on his canvasses > > > which is his realism that he called "Surrealism". > > > > > > > __ Both are Useless Yiddisher Street Corner Acts.__ > > > __________ aka Judenphysik __________ > > > > > > > > Let me put is simply, but not clear... > > > > the past does not exist > > the future does not exist > > the present does not exist... > > that means.. > > spacetime isn't going anywhere. > > > > no spacetime > > no time travel > > no time dimension. > > > > In other words...spacetime is just a math idea someone came up with, > ...nothing to do with nature. > Does space move?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Space-Time and Surrealism "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-16 17:51 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-05-17 09:54 +0200
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-17 01:09 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-05-17 12:19 +0200
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-17 04:56 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 05:30 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 06:49 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 07:01 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-17 07:06 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 04:46 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-17 11:40 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-17 11:41 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:13 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:26 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-17 23:32 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 01:31 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-18 11:31 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-05-19 09:53 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 10:05 -0700
Re: Space-Time and Surrealism "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 08:38 -0700
csiph-web