Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.

Path	csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:39:42 -0500
Message-ID	<5715C4B9.BFB@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:40:10 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
References	<571521FC.6D7A@ix.netcom.com> <57153A01.29D1@ix.netcom.com> <57153BE4.674A@ix.netcom.com> <57158493.74A3@ix.netcom.com> <5715BCCA.759C@ix.netcom.com> <5715BE9A.136F@ix.netcom.com> <5715C3FA.60AD@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	26
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-GeXlZbnSbSC+nJnRP8dxXco9GwEBzo8SMJc+JQ+5x5iW3Y4MprYPv0mm+MrrllLjSmQBRu6N7L3PoKs!Bk3KTbQHWJzAp2X+DlxC5L0gDqMoX6yauE0GSGMww2J33NZuGwkFheGpROAhJOJlNboyHFYezhr2!TSnjOWyvNQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2026
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:438298 sci.physics:571508 sci.physics.relativity:381932 alt.astronomy:284179

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > "much scientific research published today is false"
> > http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> >
> > that include EVERYTHING published at  WikipediA
> >
> > EVERYTHING
> > published at  WikipediA
> > today is false.
> >
> > EVERYTHING!
> 
> Most medical information on Wikipedia is false, say researchers
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.naturalnews.com/045522_Wikipedia_medical_information_propaganda.html
> 
> Relying on Wikipedia for honest and legitimate information about science is a recipe for intellectual failure. --The Starmaker



"Wikipedia allows anonymous editing: contributors are not required to provide any identification, or even an email address."

Thread

Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 11:05 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 11:16 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 14:14 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:48 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:56 -0700
      Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 18:06 -0700
        Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:06 -0700
          Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:14 -0700
            Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:36 -0700
              Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:40 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:41 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:47 -0700

csiph-web