Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:55:52 -0500
Message-ID	<57153BE4.674A@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:56:20 -0700
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject	Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
References	<571521FC.6D7A@ix.netcom.com> <57153A01.29D1@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Lines	61
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.219.229.47
X-Trace	sv3-5IkXpJ+3KQ6uhiBJqWQwBsXH35tKdVGs4VZ6g2UEDhyjodZq8VoFaMQqm6OHSp+9eFtDZejfU5yLqvC!h6maCMoHO7U4TVHCp2cnxKWUQ8hs/RIOXQYlyAGikEVkplY9VD+HgRzyAp2/UH2nkT9+nhCVts7C!k3uFXHIIkeA=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	3369
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:438271 sci.physics:571378 sci.physics.relativity:381910 alt.astronomy:284158

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> >
> > http://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress
> >
> > Broken Science- a lot of published research is false.
> >
> > false
> > fôls/
> > adjective
> > adjective: false; comparative adjective: falser; superlative adjective: falsest
> >
> >     1.
> >     not according with truth or fact; incorrect.
> >     "the test can produce false results"
> >     synonyms:   incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, trumped up, unfounded, spurious;
> >     counterfeit, forged, fraudulent
> >     "a false report"
> >     antonyms:   correct, truthful
> >         not according with rules or law.
> >         "false imprisonment"
> >     2.
> >     appearing to be the thing denoted; deliberately made or meant to deceive.
> >
> > incorrect, untrue, wrong, erroneous, fallacious, flawed, distorted, inaccurate, imprecise; untruthful, fictitious, concocted, fabricated, invented, made up, and
> > meant to deceive.
> >
> > and i have to get through all your fuckin garbage!
> >
> > Get on a rocket, and get the fuck out-of-my-planet!!!!
> >
> > You got fuckin 24 hours! I don't give a fuck if your rocket ship isn't ready! Let it fukin blow up wit yous in it.
> >
> > everyday is fuckin garbage from yous guys....EVERYDAY!
> >
> > you can fukin drown in your space suits!
> 
> and take your stupid teachers with you! (tell them the odds of the ship
> blowing up is a billion to one) (more false info, isn't it?)
> 
> "the scientific method has "self-correcting mechanisms" that ensure
> that, eventually, the truth will prevail.
> Unfortunately for all of us, Wilson makes a convincing argument that
> those self-correcting mechanisms are broken."
> 
> http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken
> 
> it's broken.
> 
> don't bother to fix it, it's too old...



"For starters, there's a "replication crisis" in science." 
http://theweek.com/articles/618141/big-science-broken


Translation: "I no need to stinky fuckin replicate it!!!"

Thread

Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 11:05 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 11:16 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 14:14 -0700
  Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:48 -0700
    Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 12:56 -0700
      Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 18:06 -0700
        Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:06 -0700
          Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:14 -0700
            Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:36 -0700
              Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:40 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:41 -0700
                Re: Broken Science- a lot of published research is false. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-18 22:47 -0700

csiph-web