Re: GRAVITY...

Path	csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:12:35 -0600
Message-ID	<56C4FE70.1ADC@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 15:12:48 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To	starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer	Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: GRAVITY...
References	<56C37C07.5882@ix.netcom.com> <56C4153A.3A1@ix.netcom.com> <56C4B116.7835@ix.netcom.com> <lOadnaBYLL4fL1nLnZ2dnUU7-cmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Lines	40
X-Usenet-Provider	http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host	162.239.141.5
X-Trace	sv3-dqBXnkWb0OcNM2qHL0dJ66JLHEn8TU93jTxvFw8s0G6dG3sIl8VBvr9eeRykFSCoQ6rreE11rfOcgfS!sfsgSAPrcKdgNZep9WtVr42AO3g8lhkZF14eeFHxAInCgXGGFeanIvZvKCQAIfSJDGyfTXIoC6s4!lGQLkPcY5w==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter	1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes	2149
Xref	csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:433456 alt.astronomy:282229 sci.physics:554076 sci.physics.relativity:376419

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> On 2/17/16 11:42 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > I mean, if you haven't even prove that Gravity exist
> 
>    You saw a guy fall, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You see satellites orbiting other bodies, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You once got hit bu a falling apple, acorn or walnut,
>    therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    You have noted that big balls of gas and plasma exist using hydrogen
>    into helium, therefore, gravity exists.
> 
>    The existence og gravitation or warped spacetime is not in question.


You have no evidence that gravity exist.


I'll ask you a question...is Gravity a Theory?


: an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is not known or proven to be true
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theory



I'll ask you this question...is Gravity a Theory? Yes or No??


or


Is there a theory called... The Theory of Gravity??? Si or No, senoir?



Ja or nien?

Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 16:10 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:25 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 16:39 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:57 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 21:11 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          /alfven, J. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:15 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
            gra-something noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 20:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 21:48 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000
        Re: GRAVITY... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 04:27 -0800

csiph-web