Re: The origin of...inertia

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written
Subject	Re: The origin of...inertia
Date	2016-02-01 10:56 -0800
Organization	Netfront http://www.netfront.net/
Message-ID	<56AFAA40.6E28@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	<56AE70B4.187C@ix.netcom.com> <56AF0677.5427@ix.netcom.com> <n8o45k$7a3$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

David Staup wrote:
> 
> On 2/1/2016 1:17 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> inertia
> >>
> >> a property of matter by which it continues in its existing state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line,
> >> unless that state is changed by an external force.
> >>
> >> Now, I'll explain
> >> 'the origin' and reasons
> >> 'why' we have "inertia" today.
> >>
> >> The big bang created...inertia.
> >>
> >> Before the big bang...
> >> there was no inertia.
> >>
> >> Before the big bang
> >> all things did not move.
> >>
> >> In order to get the ball rolling..
> >> in order to begin to play the game...universe,
> >>
> >> you had to start the game.
> >
> >
> > The big bang created a new principle: unless that state is changed by an external force.
> >
> 
> chuckle
> 
> why don't you post this on sci.astro.research?
> 
> I'm sure they'd all get a big laugh
> 
> dumb fuck


sci.astro.research is a moderated newsgroup...do they allow words like "dumb fuck" to be posted?


You are posting here because you like...Freedom, not some communist run groups like sci.astro.research.


What like of research do they do at sci.astro.research, Google searches? Fox news science stories??


How about how they respond to your posts?


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.astro.research/w351EkE_pt4


"The moderator's comments are all true." --Phillip Helbig



Phillip Helbig can go fuck himself!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Thread

The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-31 12:38 -0800
  Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-31 23:17 -0800
    Re: The origin of...inertia David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-01 11:23 -0600
      Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 10:56 -0800
        Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 11:16 -0800
          Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 11:28 -0800
        Re: The origin of...inertia David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2016-02-01 13:38 -0600
  The origin of...inertia HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:42 -0800
    Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 10:59 -0800
    Re: The origin of...inertia benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 14:49 -0500
  Re: The origin of...inertia "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-01 12:43 -0500
    Re: The origin of...inertia HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 09:57 -0800
    Re: The origin of...inertia The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-01 11:18 -0800
  Re: The origin of...inertia "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 12:29 -0800
    Re: The origin of...inertia benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 20:18 -0500

csiph-web