Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #532167

Re: INFINITY

Path csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!enother.net!enother.net!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:55:43 -0600
Message-ID <56439D3D.4747@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:55:41 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: INFINITY
References <5642F478.55FD@ix.netcom.com> <tm064b9tp2tmcu01t5n4pdqqcdeadi5jkp@4ax.com> <R4CdnVPxCtskyd7LnZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <37739210-224b-426c-a880-969c6bdf8e41@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 42
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 45.49.183.72
X-Trace sv3-hWEhFkMXIhhPA77ZphDQ1Uuw3/kFmCFxEtUUaoDdDnBc5AplkgyUydmhIWTQuGLQHv3BTVPnAqy61YO!V1LXLNT87KRzpIP2k3eP2irrRgpsPMAvoL5bUd6S9fUXn7TwOgoBawAw3eJHfTz6akPCCr+pxxbg!iJKnwxHZ
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2238
X-Received-Bytes 2350
X-Received-Body-CRC 2793721070
Xref csiph.com alt.astronomy:278961 rec.arts.sf.written:426106 sci.physics:532167 sci.physics.relativity:369693

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 6:46:18 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
> > On 11/11/15 2:57 AM, HGW wrote:
> > > A collection of lengths defines a volume in Space.
> >
> >    Not true a collection of length in 1-D space only defines a collection
> >    of lengths.
> >
> 
> A universe of physical
> objects as mathematical
> objects, has that each
> relation among them, and
> those among them, etcetera
> and ad infinitum, each is
> another physical object,
> and there are not finitely
> many of them.
> 
> The universe of physical
> objects as mathematical
> objects would be its own
> "powerset" of physical,
> mathematical objects, and
> contain itself.  It is
> thus Absolute and Infinite.
> 
> In concrete mathematical
> resource terms, it's all
> one "Continuum".
> 
> There is just the one
> Universe.


i'm talking about REAL infinities, not mathematical infinities. 

There is no REAL infinity. The universe is finite.


or as they say...nothing last forever.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-10 23:55 -0800
  Re: INFINITY HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-11-11 19:57 +1100
    Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 08:46 -0600
      Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 11:55 -0800
        Re: INFINITY David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-11-11 14:19 -0600
          Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 13:12 -0800
  INFINITY HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 06:20 -0800
    Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 08:40 -0600
      Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:01 -0500
        Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 13:16 -0800
          Re: INFINITY gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-11 21:21 -0600
            Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 19:40 -0800
            Re: INFINITY je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-11-12 02:02 -0800
              Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 09:39 -0800
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 11:47 -0600
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 23:25 -0800
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 09:09 -0600
                Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 15:52 -0500
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:07 -0600
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:11 -0600
                Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 16:39 -0500
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 16:11 -0600
                Re: INFINITY "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 14:43 -0800
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 17:24 -0600
                Re: INFINITY Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-13 23:44 +0100
                Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-13 19:39 -0500
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 18:50 -0600
                Re: INFINITY kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 04:39 -0500
                Re: INFINITY Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-13 14:48 -0800
                Re: INFINITY "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:05 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-13 15:59 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-14 11:46 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-14 12:04 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 14:27 -0800
                Re: INFINITY pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 14:35 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 15:07 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 16:23 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 21:56 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 11:16 -0800
                Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 13:29 -0600
                Re: INFINITY dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 15:50 -0500
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 13:48 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-16 14:45 -0800
                Re: INFINITY HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 15:39 -0800
                Re: INFINITY pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 20:14 -0800
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-15 14:57 -0800
                Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 14:06 -0500
                Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 11:42 -0800
              Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 13:15 -0500
                Re: INFINITY Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-12 10:26 -0800
          Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 19:37 -0800
      Re: INFINITY HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 10:27 -0800
        Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 11:55 -0800
          Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 13:14 -0800
            Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. "Efftard J. Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-11-12 18:10 -0800
              Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:15 -0800
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:35 -0500
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 04:15 -0800
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 14:24 -0500
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:21 -0800
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 04:16 -0500
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 03:10 -0800
                Re: The _observable_ universe is finite. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 13:26 -0800
    Re: INFINITY benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 11:59 -0500
  Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 08:43 -0600
  Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-11 18:25 -0800
    Re: INFINITY David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-11-12 13:04 -0600
      Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 11:54 -0800
        Re: INFINITY The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-11-12 22:51 -0800
  Re: INFINITY "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 10:16 -0800
    Re: INFINITY Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 15:12 -0600
  Re: INFINITY Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-16 15:58 -0800
    Re: INFINITY "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 16:47 -0800

csiph-web