Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #576266

Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks?

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks?
Date 2016-05-07 21:07 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <52220d-8ls.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <qqOdnSK-1uX9jrTKnZ2dnUU7-S3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <971a50bc-84f6-46e8-9bea-b6e1a9a45a21@googlegroups.com> <ZeGdnSO-F_vwy7PKnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/5/16 5:29 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 2:08:51 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Is it good if a vacuum really sucks?
>>>
>>> Please discuss.
>>
>>   Please define your terms.
>>
>> "good"
>>
>> "vacuum"
>>
>> "really"
>>
>> "sucks"
>>
>>
>>   Mark L. Fergerson
>>
> 
>   DuckDuckGo is a really good way to look up the meanings of words.

A dictionary is the best way to look up the meanings of words.

 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 16:08 -0500
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-03 21:31 +0000
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-03 17:02 -0500
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-05-04 12:28 +0000
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 06:48 -0700
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 15:19 -0700
    Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-06 17:13 -0700
      Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-06 19:19 -0500
        Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 14:17 -0500
      Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 13:44 -0700
        Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-07 16:29 -0700
  Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 15:29 -0700
    Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-05 23:22 -0400
    Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 15:56 -0500
      Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-07 21:07 +0000
      Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-05-07 17:33 -0500
      Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 16:51 -0700
        Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-08 01:49 +0000
        Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 12:56 -0500
          Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-05-08 11:21 -0700
            Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 13:49 -0500
              Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Raymond Yohros <bat@birdband.net> - 2016-05-08 16:25 -0700
          Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 16:47 -0700
            Re: Is it good if a vacuum really sucks? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 18:50 -0500

csiph-web