Re: Hand Held X-Ray source

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Hand Held X-Ray source
Date	2016-06-15 17:21 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<4df83d-8uf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<njqede$11i5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <umu63d-ssa.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <njrhou$g0v$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw

Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 6/14/2016 10:30 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> Was at Dentist today used a battery powered X-Ray, looked like a larger
>>> plastic gun, did not use film, but used a digital microchannel plate w
>>> xray floresent inside plastic case.  Lower X ray intensity.
>>>
>>> remember when the motor would wind up and provide a large burst of
>>> current for the large xray tube to do an xray ?  (and blast the area ?)
> 
>>> http://www.dentalcompare.com/News/134747-New-Dental-Product-NOMAD-Pro-2-Handheld-X-ray-System-from-Aribex/
>>>
>>> every home should have one.  Amaze your friends!
>>
>> I thought you were terrified of radiation?
>>
>>
> 
> to overcome fear, I thought I would start off with small doses of it.
 
Great plan... 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Hand Held X-Ray source Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-14 21:26 -0500
  Re: Hand Held X-Ray source jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-15 03:30 +0000
    Re: Hand Held X-Ray source Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-15 07:30 -0500
      Re: Hand Held X-Ray source jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-15 17:21 +0000
    Re: Hand Held X-Ray source Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-15 16:15 -0500
      Re: Hand Held X-Ray source "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 15:07 -0700
      Re: Hand Held X-Ray source jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-15 22:58 +0000
  Re: Hand Held X-Ray source eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2016-06-15 04:39 -0700

csiph-web