Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562067
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <927a4a9c-307c-4ce2-823e-792172d02cfa@googlegroups.com> <1679f84a3cce327eabd968c27528aede@dizum.com> <5aea41f8-2f8f-4658-87d2-1530b977ddb3@googlegroups.com> <4981dfb19df51c25a8726a68e9a32883@dizum.com> <f8ba81a0-7289-4912-a6c5-1d3e13ddd120@googlegroups.com> |
| Subject | Re: Earth to Nutcase dude |
| Message-ID | <2a3072956dc3a57cae0b7459fc9bf0cf@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-03-13 08:52 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:f8ba81a0-7289-4912-a6c5-1d3e13ddd120@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Saturday, March 12, 2016 at 10:10:29 PM UTC-8, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James McGinn, in >> <news:5aea41f8-2f8f-4658-87d2-1530b977ddb3@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 11:39:33 PM UTC-8, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Only when some H bonds are attached, neutralizing some polarity, is it >>>>> possible to pull H2O molecules off a surface, and that requires multiple >>>>> H2O molecules. >>>> Wrong. >>> I am right. Read my paper. >> Wrong, > You don't have a coherent argument. Just blather. Sure I do, Jim. Message-ID: <248b979ce8b36a21b1cea21844e010d6@dizum.com> You're projecting, James. It's *you* who has no coherent argument. I've dismantled your kooky conspiracy theory via more than a half-dozen different avenues, none of which you are able to refute. Now you're blathering about some magical hypothetical "plasma not-a-plasma" that cannot exist, plasmized via an energy source which does not exist in the troposphere. Get to answering those tough questions, Jim... Do you really think the entire world has been wrong for a century and a half, and *you*, the kooktard who cannot answer my tough questions, is right, Jim? Or do you think the Occam's Razor explanation is that you're a delusional Dunning-Kruger afflicted schizophrenic paranoid kook who's concocted a kooky conspiracy theory that is laughably wrong? Why can't you get your kooky conspiracy theory through the peer-review process, Jim? Why are there *no* corroborating papers that back up your kooky contentions, Jim? The ones you've provided I've used to prove you and your kooky conspiracy theory *wrong*. How are your kooky atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? How is your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water is dissociating into hydrogen and oxygen, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your kooky "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding, and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your kooky conspiracy theory is workable, Jim? Why can't you answer those questions, Jim? Your kooky conspiracy theory has been utterly destroyed, Jim. It does not and cannot reflect reality. Deal with that reality as you will, Jim. Most Dunning-Kruger afflicted kooktards like you, when presented with the proof that they are delusional, tend to 'circle the wagons' to protect their delusions, driving themselves ever deeper into insanity. I note you are doing the same. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic"; That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:45 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:40 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 21:56 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:58 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 20:52 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:29 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 23:45 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:00 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 22:28 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 08:52 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 01:14 -0800
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:17 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 21:41 -0700
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 06:21 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 22:56 -0700
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 07:07 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 00:24 -0700
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 17:32 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-14 12:44 -0400
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-15 05:54 +0100
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 10:18 -0700
Re: Earth to Nutcase dude Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 22:10 -0600
csiph-web