Re: How risky is low level Radiation ?

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: How risky is low level Radiation ?
Date	2016-06-10 21:48 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<27pr2d-hd2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<njelst$55s$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b81099e6-6b99-4aa8-8d34-9edec9f617ba@googlegroups.com> <5879d252-37fa-4f92-a544-d853b5b3a6cb@googlegroups.com> <fc6bf007-2523-46d0-823f-78d439aabda6@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:21:48 PM UTC-7, Mikkel Haaheim wrote:
>> Very small exposure area, very low intensity, and rather minor tissue. Not very much of a hazard.
> 
> 
> I don't know.  A lot of people are getting lymphoma nowadays in the same
> general area where they have been exposed to repeated dental X-rays
> throughout their lives.
> 
> Double-A

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymphoma

Radiation isn't even mentioned as a risk factor in any kind of lymphomas.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

How risky is low level Radiation ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-10 10:20 -0500
  Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-10 12:06 -0700
    Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 12:21 -0700
      Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-10 13:37 -0700
        Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:48 +0000
          Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-06-11 12:36 -0700
            Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 15:15 -0700
    Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:44 +0000
  Re: How risky is low level Radiation ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-10 21:40 +0000

csiph-web