Re: Like to ask NASA this Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse?

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Like to ask NASA this Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse?
Date	2016-01-16 18:53 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<26gqmc-k6s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<83fefeeb-0dab-46d7-b4fd-aa5e27c27cba@googlegroups.com> <d7f26a11-2dc2-4f14-b992-9fe7b43079a2@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> We know this collapse takes place in QM when an observation takes place(it fits here too) Hey it could come under "uncertainty" NASA has to think more and steal less I love to think  TreBert
> 
> Another thought I think of waves like EM easy to see. I read Max Born has waves we can't see as "probability waves"(Not real in any form) Tricky stuff.TreBert

Babbling gibberish; sober up before you post.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Like to ask NASA this  Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 17:32 -0800
  Re: Like to ask NASA this  Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 17:57 -0800
    Re: Like to ask NASA this  Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 02:35 -0800
    Re: Like to ask NASA this  Could LIGO create a Wave Collapse? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-16 18:53 +0000

csiph-web