Re: The cosmic start of lightning

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: The cosmic start of lightning
Date	2016-05-08 02:50 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<24m20d-1f1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<ZeGdnSu-F_su27PKnZ2dnUU7-fsAAAAA@giganews.com> <kf020d-res.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nglrmi01oij@news3.newsguy.com> <jjb20d-fb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ngm2h701tm0@news6.newsguy.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 May 2016 23:50:43 +0000, jimp wrote:
> 
>>  
>> Ever seen a cloud up close, like 500 feet?
>>
> 
> Yes, just about a week ago.
> 
> The cloud was fog that formed over a school playground
> during the early morning.  (Fog is nothing more than
> a very low altitude cloud.)
> 
> So what?
 
There is a reason for the two words, i.e. cloud and fog.

Not all clouds, particularly those in a thunder storm, are puffy little
balls. 
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

The cosmic start of lightning Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:49 -0500
  Re: The cosmic start of lightning jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-07 20:40 +0000
    Re: The cosmic start of lightning john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:51 -0700
      Re: The cosmic start of lightning "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 17:07 -0700
    Re: The cosmic start of lightning Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-05-07 22:54 +0000
      Re: The cosmic start of lightning jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-07 23:50 +0000
        Re: The cosmic start of lightning Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-05-08 00:50 +0000
          Re: The cosmic start of lightning jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-08 02:50 +0000
  Re: The cosmic start of lightning "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 12:55 -0700
    Re: The cosmic start of lightning "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-10 21:22 -0700

csiph-web