Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed
Date	2016-04-03 18:22 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<1k38tc-43m.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<ifudnbHuNKLMImLLnZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ghc5tc-q8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ndp0pl$kok$1@dont-email.me> <ine5tc-afd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <ndr6cs$a37$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dne 02/04/2016 v 20:13 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com napsal(a):
>> Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dne 02/04/2016 v 19:36 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com napsal(a):
>>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed
>>>>
>>>> The last ice age is ending?
>>>>
>>>> Not that this has anything to do with physics, spammer.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I see, ice melting is related to psychology. :-)
>> 
>> Nope, how about sci.geo.meteorology, sci.geo.geology or alt.global-warming.
>> 
> 
> Posting to specialized groups would make sense 20 years ago,
> not today during massive Usenet decline.

According to historical statistics, USENET traffic at the end of 1996, i.e.
20 years ago was about 4.5 GB/day.

Today it is about 24 TB/day.

What is true is that the volumes in discussion groups are down, mostly
because of blogs, while the volume of binaries are up. 

However, even if the volume of discussions is down, that does not mean
that anarchy should reign.

People still read sci.geo.meteorology, sci.geo.geology and I doubt many
of them also read sci.physics, so posting a copy of something dealing
with geology to a physics group is both stupid and rude.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 07:47 -0500
  Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-02 17:36 +0000
    Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:54 +0200
      Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-02 18:13 +0000
        Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 15:41 +0200
          Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 08:00 -0700
            Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 08:25 -0700
              Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 08:57 -0700
              Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 00:50 -0400
          Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 16:41 +0000
            Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 19:06 +0200
              Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 17:43 +0000
          Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-03 18:22 +0000
            Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 12:44 -0700
    Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 22:01 -0400
      Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 07:57 -0500
  Re: New cause of exceptional Greenland melt revealed James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 10:07 -0700

csiph-web