Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #585895

Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.misc

Show all headers | View raw

AlleyCat wrote:
^^^^^^^^
You are not expecting me to take you seriously, are you?

> On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:56:52 +0200,  Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn says...
>> > [?]  Are you one of the nut cases who believes the propaganda
>> > that CO2 rises first and then temperature rises because of it?
>> > 
>> > If you are then you are misinformed because that's not what
>> > happens. Ice core samples prove that FIRST the temperature
>> > increases and then it is FOLLOWED by increased levels of
>> > atmospheric CO2.
>> 
>> That is an extraordinary claim.  Extraordinary claims
>> require extraordinary evivence.  Cite that evidence.
> 
> "Extraordinary" evivence (sic)?

You are replying to a posting that had been superseded by a correct one 
almost 13 hours before you replied.

> You mean "extraordinary" to laymen?
> There's nothing extraordinary about carbon dating CO² trapped in ice.

Straw man.
 
> I'm not sure who or what you're replying to or asking the question of,

Proper quoting would have helped you to see that.  There was an attribution 
line in my posting that you did not quote.

> but I'll post this one scientist,

Just one?  How many scientists, how many findings described in how many 
papers, support the theory of global warming?

> (are YOU a scientist?)

By interest, education, and degree, but not working at or for an institution 
of higher education.

> who works with ice core samples and IS a paleo-climatologist, who HAS
> evivence (sic)

When there are no good arguments, spelling errors (corrected long before) 
provide a convenient target.

> that CO² release,

Release to where?

> does in fact, follows temperature rises.

You, too, have to answer the question: Where does the rise of temperature 
come from?
 
> Are YOU a paleo-climatologist?

No.  Are *you*?  Is it even relevant?  Does one have to be a cow to tell if 
the milk is sour?

> I'll include the lies that that well-known scientist, Al Gore, told, just
> show a contradictory side of the argument.

The IPCC consisting of hundreds of climatologists happen to say the same 
that Al Gore said.  Why do you think that is?
 
> http://tinypic.com/r/2vmwntd/9

You are not expecting me to take this seriously, are you?  First of all, 
what is said in that video without clear authorship is based on the false 
premise that the theory of global warming is solely based on what Al Gore 
said in the movie “An Inconvenient Truth”.  Ex falso quodlibet.

Second, the Vostok ice core argument has been disproved by me almost 8 hours 
before you replied, in <news:2525334.e9J7NaK4W3@PointedEars.de>.  I have yet 
to encounter such a lousy newsfeed.

So, “good morning, sunshine!”  (No pun intended.)


Your newsreader, too, is apparently misconfigured or borken.  There was a 
properly encoded _subscript_ 2 in the Subject header field value (which I 
have now restored).  If your newsreader, apparently MicroPlanet Gravity 
3.0.4, does not support MIME, and mangles characters instead, it is unfit 
for Usenet since November 2009; see RFC 5536, § 2.3.  As that version had 
been released on *September* 12, *2010*, it would have to be considered 
*buggy*.

F'up2 sci.misc

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Uh-oh, spaghettio kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-18 12:19 -0400
  Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-06-18 12:57 -0400
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-06-18 17:58 +0000
      Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 14:15 -0400
      Leave It To a Denierrrrr... AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-06-18 17:01 -0500
      Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-20 11:23 -0500
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-18 19:34 +0000
    Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ (was: Uh-oh, spaghettio) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-20 10:57 +0200
      Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-06-20 10:49 -0500
    Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO? (was: Uh-oh, spaghettio) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-20 08:46 -0400
      Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-20 15:43 +0200
        Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-20 20:41 -0400
        Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-20 20:53 -0400
          Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-21 11:25 +0200
    Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO2 (was: Uh-oh, spaghettio) AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-06-20 16:51 -0500
      Re: Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-21 00:57 +0200
  Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-19 06:46 +0200
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-19 20:47 +0000
      Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-20 07:07 +0200
        Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-21 01:22 +0000
          Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-21 05:37 +0200
            Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-21 20:51 +0000
              Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-22 05:35 +0200
              Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-22 06:40 -0400
  Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2016-06-21 06:05 -0400

csiph-web