Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #557545
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? |
| Date | Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:21:48 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <1671334.9yOO7G6Agg@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <djg3odFpkqtU1@mid.individual.net> <2266566.rmCSWFARhr@PointedEars.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1456665709 12328 eJwNwoERACEIA7CVWoUi4yAn+4/wf4lvUR0ml/n8bvqui+EZJRVL6FrGB7yK6PSZwyQeCegDDWsQNQ== (28 Feb 2016 13:21:49 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 28 Feb 2016 13:21:49 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.14.2 |
| X-User-ID | eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVCP8YJxX2H6F3MCo7nKBjsaSruYYI5Cpy9SXDlClvhmvVt+MwYj7Wh1N+dty28Hry/hfoFLg= |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Zh4qdqy3bUB2dqV1oPuK2eyY+wg= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwNwoERwCAIBLCVFHiQcR6o+49gL4H69g5zuOH+Epjbll3RQ+NHihzZUJc5bhKLLElOQVc+JjsRJg== |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:557545 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 7 wrote:
>> […] But at some point, these Lagrange points swing right into
>> the surface of the smaller black hole and cut right the way in
>> into interior of the smaller black hole and rip it open.
>
> Utter nonsense. Lagrangian points are nothing more than positions in
> space where relatively stable can be achieved, and black holes cannot be
^orbits
> "ripped open". […]
PointedEars
--
I heard that entropy isn't what it used to be.
(from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 11:24 +0000
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 13:07 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 12:25 +0000
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 14:23 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 13:32 +0000
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 14:03 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 14:21 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 13:30 +0000
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 14:52 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 13:59 +0000
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 15:04 +0100
Re: Lagrange points not modelled correctly on black hole merger simulations? 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-02-28 16:03 +0000
csiph-web