Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #479520 > unrolled thread

Re: Does Gravity Actually Bend Light? Or Are We Fooling Ourselves -- Again?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Does Gravity Actually Bend Light? Or Are We Fooling Ourselves -- Again? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-10 13:33 +0000
    Re: Does Gravity Actually Bend Light? Or Are We Fooling Ourselves -- Again? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-12-11 13:15 -0800

#479520 — Re: Does Gravity Actually Bend Light? Or Are We Fooling Ourselves -- Again?

>So,  Moronic,  do you agree with Pnal when he says,  "Yes, but what you 
>*don't* understand is that when water vapor is part of the air, things 
>are very different?"

I stand by Dalton's Gas Law which states that gaseous water contributes
0.023 atmosphere, or 0.338 psi partial pressure of H2O vapor at 20 C, at 
equilibrium.

You still haven't shown us what happens when 20 C water gets introduced
to 20 C dry air, using Dalton's Law.

> You goons ain't got nuttin

You are projecting the fact you have nothing on everyone else. FAIL.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#479647

On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 5:33:05 AM UTC-8, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >So,  Moronic,  do you agree with Pnal when he says,  "Yes, but what you 
> >*don't* understand is that when water vapor is part of the air, things 
> >are very different?"
> 
> I stand by Dalton's Gas Law which states that gaseous water contributes
> 0.023 atmosphere, or 0.338 psi partial pressure of H2O vapor at 20 C, at 
> equilibrium.
> 
> You still haven't shown us what happens when 20 C water gets introduced
> to 20 C dry air, using Dalton's Law.
> 
> > You goons ain't got nuttin
> 
> You are projecting the fact you have nothing on everyone else. FAIL.

Light and atom are motion curve directed by the gravity curve
of which is not seen. The observable motion curves are the evidence 
of the space curves that can't be seen.


Mitchell Raemsch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web