Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #477149 > unrolled thread

How to use Galilean trasform

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-15 09:21 -0800
    Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 18:27 +0000
      Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-15 10:53 -0800
        Re: How to use Galilean trasform Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 14:56 -0800
          Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 23:03 +0000
            Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-15 22:57 -0800
              Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 12:08 +0000
                Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-16 06:19 -0800
      Re: How to use Galilean trasform Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 19:02 -0800
        Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 14:04 +0000
          Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-20 07:02 -0800
            Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 16:13 +0000
              Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-20 10:40 -0800
                Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 18:47 +0000
                  Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-20 23:39 -0800
                    Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 14:22 +0000
                      Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-21 06:43 -0800
                        Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:35 +0000
                          Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-21 10:48 -0800
                            Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 19:00 +0000
                              Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-21 11:12 -0800
                                Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 19:19 +0000
                                  Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-21 12:09 -0800
    Re: How to use Galilean trasform moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-16 20:31 +0000
      Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-16 12:58 -0800
        Re: How to use Galilean trasform Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 00:04 +0000
          Re: How to use Galilean trasform mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-11-17 06:11 -0800

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#477749

On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 20:00:36 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 18:35:30 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 15:22:48 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 19:48:02 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 17:13:42 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 15:04:45 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 10:27:37 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every idiot woodworker knows that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> See? You don’t know how to use them. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> To use the Galilean transform, one needs to use the DISCRETE vector form.
> >>>>>>>>>>> One can substitute in a choice of coordinate system afterwards.  This
> >>>>>>>>>>> also goes for any transforms including the Lorentz transform.  For the
> >>>>>>>>>>> invariance transformation, check out chapter J of the following treatise.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://107.184.176.53/Aether01.pdf
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng, Galileo knew nothing of vector forms. 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Odd, poor idiot. Galileo didn't invent GT.
> >>>>>>>>> They are much, much later.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> How much later, specifically, Wozniak?
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_transformation
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Yes I’ve read that whole article before. 
> >>>>>> Note that it doesn’t list when they were invented much, much later than
> >>>>>> Galileo. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> You can't read, poor idiot:
> >>>>> "Though the transformations are named for Galileo, it is absolute time
> >>>>> and space as conceived by Isaac Newton that provides their domain of definition."
> >>>> 
> >>>> Galileo was 1638. That is 380 years ago.  Isaac Newton wrote his in 1687. 
> >>>> That is 331 years ago. Isaac Newton credited Galileo with his formulation.
> >>>> So you are calling 49 years out of 380 “much, much later”?
> >>> 
> >>> Why not?
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>>> But they are also later than Newton. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> They were invented later than Newton? When, exactly?
> >>> 
> >>> When the concept of 4-dimensional spacetime arised,
> >>> poor halfbrain.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Wait... you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not
> >> invented until 1908? What in heaven’s name gave you THAT idea??
> > 
> > They are equations of 4 dimensional spacetime,
> > poor idiot.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Space and time as coordinates were established well before Galileo.

:)
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Descartes

> Do you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not invented
> until the commingled structure of spacetime was conceived? 

Odd, poor idiot. They are equations of a 4-dimensional
spacetime. "t'=t" is an integral part of them. Noone 
needed to write "t'=t" before your idiot guru came.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477750

<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 20:00:36 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 18:35:30 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 15:22:48 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 19:48:02 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 17:13:42 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 15:04:45 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 10:27:37 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every idiot woodworker knows that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? You don’t know how to use them. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To use the Galilean transform, one needs to use the DISCRETE vector form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> One can substitute in a choice of coordinate system afterwards.  This
>>>>>>>>>>>>> also goes for any transforms including the Lorentz transform.  For the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> invariance transformation, check out chapter J of the following treatise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://107.184.176.53/Aether01.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng, Galileo knew nothing of vector forms. 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Odd, poor idiot. Galileo didn't invent GT.
>>>>>>>>>>> They are much, much later.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> How much later, specifically, Wozniak?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_transformation
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Yes I’ve read that whole article before. 
>>>>>>>> Note that it doesn’t list when they were invented much, much later than
>>>>>>>> Galileo. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You can't read, poor idiot:
>>>>>>> "Though the transformations are named for Galileo, it is absolute time
>>>>>>> and space as conceived by Isaac Newton that provides their domain of definition."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Galileo was 1638. That is 380 years ago.  Isaac Newton wrote his in 1687. 
>>>>>> That is 331 years ago. Isaac Newton credited Galileo with his formulation.
>>>>>> So you are calling 49 years out of 380 “much, much later”?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But they are also later than Newton. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They were invented later than Newton? When, exactly?
>>>>> 
>>>>> When the concept of 4-dimensional spacetime arised,
>>>>> poor halfbrain.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Wait... you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not
>>>> invented until 1908? What in heaven’s name gave you THAT idea??
>>> 
>>> They are equations of 4 dimensional spacetime,
>>> poor idiot.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Space and time as coordinates were established well before Galileo.
> 
> :)
> https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Descartes
> 
>> Do you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not invented
>> until the commingled structure of spacetime was conceived? 
> 
> Odd, poor idiot. They are equations of a 4-dimensional
> spacetime. "t'=t" is an integral part of them. Noone 
> needed to write "t'=t" before your idiot guru came.
> 
> 

So you really don’t have any clue as to this. Well done. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477753

On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 20:20:00 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 20:00:36 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 18:35:30 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, 21 November 2018 15:22:48 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 19:48:02 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 17:13:42 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 15:04:45 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, November 15, 2018 at 10:27:37 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every idiot woodworker knows that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> See? You don’t know how to use them. 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To use the Galilean transform, one needs to use the DISCRETE vector form.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> One can substitute in a choice of coordinate system afterwards.  This
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> also goes for any transforms including the Lorentz transform.  For the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> invariance transformation, check out chapter J of the following treatise.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://107.184.176.53/Aether01.pdf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ahjohng, Galileo knew nothing of vector forms. 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Odd, poor idiot. Galileo didn't invent GT.
> >>>>>>>>>>> They are much, much later.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> How much later, specifically, Wozniak?
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galilean_transformation
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Yes I’ve read that whole article before. 
> >>>>>>>> Note that it doesn’t list when they were invented much, much later than
> >>>>>>>> Galileo. 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> You can't read, poor idiot:
> >>>>>>> "Though the transformations are named for Galileo, it is absolute time
> >>>>>>> and space as conceived by Isaac Newton that provides their domain of definition."
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Galileo was 1638. That is 380 years ago.  Isaac Newton wrote his in 1687. 
> >>>>>> That is 331 years ago. Isaac Newton credited Galileo with his formulation.
> >>>>>> So you are calling 49 years out of 380 “much, much later”?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Why not?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>>> But they are also later than Newton. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> They were invented later than Newton? When, exactly?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> When the concept of 4-dimensional spacetime arised,
> >>>>> poor halfbrain.
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Wait... you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not
> >>>> invented until 1908? What in heaven’s name gave you THAT idea??
> >>> 
> >>> They are equations of 4 dimensional spacetime,
> >>> poor idiot.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Space and time as coordinates were established well before Galileo.
> > 
> > :)
> > https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Descartes
> > 
> >> Do you seriously believe that the Galilean transforms were not invented
> >> until the commingled structure of spacetime was conceived? 
> > 
> > Odd, poor idiot. They are equations of a 4-dimensional
> > spacetime. "t'=t" is an integral part of them. Noone 
> > needed to write "t'=t" before your idiot guru came.
> > 
> > 
> 
> So you really don’t have any clue as to this. Well done. 

And you're a queen of England too, poor halfbrain.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477268

mlwozniak@wp.pl raved and spat:

>On Thursday, 15 November 2018 17:59:26 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:

>> And you have no idea how to use Galilean transforms. 

>Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
>is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
>for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
>Every idiot woodworker knows that.

More important than knowing how to use the Galilean transform is knowing
when to use it, and when NOT to use it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477274

On Friday, 16 November 2018 21:31:38 UTC+1, Michael Moroney  wrote:
> mlwozniak@wp.pl raved and spat:
> 
> >On Thursday, 15 November 2018 17:59:26 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> 
> >> And you have no idea how to use Galilean transforms. 
> 
> >Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
> >is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
> >for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
> >Every idiot woodworker knows that.
> 
> More important than knowing how to use the Galilean transform is knowing
> when to use it, and when NOT to use it.

Too bad your bunch of idiots have no clue.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477293

<mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> On Friday, 16 November 2018 21:31:38 UTC+1, Michael Moroney  wrote:
>> mlwozniak@wp.pl raved and spat:
>> 
>>> On Thursday, 15 November 2018 17:59:26 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
>> 
>>>> And you have no idea how to use Galilean transforms. 
>> 
>>> Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
>>> is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
>>> for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
>>> Every idiot woodworker knows that.
>> 
>> More important than knowing how to use the Galilean transform is knowing
>> when to use it, and when NOT to use it.
> 
> Too bad your bunch of idiots have no clue.
> 
> 

Rave and spit. It’s all you can do. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#477318

On Saturday, 17 November 2018 01:04:06 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
> > On Friday, 16 November 2018 21:31:38 UTC+1, Michael Moroney  wrote:
> >> mlwozniak@wp.pl raved and spat:
> >> 
> >>> On Thursday, 15 November 2018 17:59:26 UTC+1, Odd Bodkin  wrote:
> >> 
> >>>> And you have no idea how to use Galilean transforms. 
> >> 
> >>> Of course, the proper way of using Galilean transform
> >>> is - screwing it up to demonstrate they can't be used, 
> >>> for the glory of The Shit of Great Guru.
> >>> Every idiot woodworker knows that.
> >> 
> >> More important than knowing how to use the Galilean transform is knowing
> >> when to use it, and when NOT to use it.
> > 
> > Too bad your bunch of idiots have no clue.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Rave and spit. It’s all you can do. 

Once again, poor halfbrain. When you're using them 
you're getting inaccuracies. You admit it yourself. 
I don't have such problems. Who of us knows how 
to use them?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web